On June 13, the Ministry of National Defense released the latest All-Out Defense Response Handbook. The updated handbook covers the techniques of telling friend from foe and accessing accurate information. While the military’s effort should be applauded, the Ministry of National Defense should consider the situation more from the civilians’ perspective, particularly in terms of differentiating friend from foe.
Here are some suggestions for the military:
First, senior military officers find it easy to tell Taiwan’s armed forces from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), even though all of them are in camouflage uniforms. On the other hand, civilians might not be able to distinguish between the two or tell the difference between uniforms of the Marine Corps from those of the army. The illustrations of camouflage uniforms should be clearer.
Second, elements of caricature in portraying soldiers should be removed, given that they might increase the difficulty in telling friend from foe. During wartime, the impression of caricatured soldiers would make it harder for Taiwanese to recognize the enemy.
Third, the portrayal of Taiwan’s armed forces and the PLA should be revised. The caricature of the former with a big smile and the latter with a pouting expression is unnecessary. This also shows a sense of complacency, which should be avoided.
Lastly, the ranks and lines on the camouflage uniforms are confusing. Civilians do not know much about the classification of our armed forces, and conscripted soldiers rarely have a chance to communicate with others in different ranks and lines. In this case, the illustration is redundant, and the military might want to eliminate it.
Hopefully, the All-Out Defense Response Handbook can be further edited to fulfill its purpose. It should be an emergency survival manual for every household and individual. The Ministry of National Defense should remove unnecessary details and make the handbook more accessible for the public, to boost people’s willingness to read it thoroughly and keep the important points in mind.
The military should not emphasize creativity too much only to please the media and the public, and it should not be satisfied with the current version. The All-Out Defense Response Handbook must be taken seriously.
Fang Ping-sheng is a former major in the Republic of China Marine Corps.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s