A legislator recently asked the government: If there is no “power shortage” as the government says, why does it have to purchase electricity from the private sector? Why does Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) offer private companies as much as NT$10 per kilowatt-hour? Why are energy bills increasing?
In the American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan’s AmCham Taiwan White Paper this year, it acknowledges the government’s commitment to green energy, but added that emulating the US’ energy policy would give Taiwan a performance boost.
Former US secretary of energy Steven Chu (朱棣文), a Nobel laureate, in 2009 said that reducing peaks in demand is paramount, as 10 percent of generation assets are needed less than 5 percent of the time.
In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the US Congress ordered the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to assess demand response capacity — namely the purchase of electricity from the private sector — and to make an annual report. This amount, including all of the energy accessible for different types of users, reached 30 gigawatts in 2020, or about the net capacity of 30 nuclear generating units.
Aside from power outages in extreme weather, foreign investors do not expect the US to face long-term power shortages due to its policy of purchasing energy from private companies.
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生), who is Taipower’s interim chairman, said that Taiwan is not facing a power shortage, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) has said: “We can only believe the government when it says we have enough energy.”
In advanced economies, agencies responsible for providing stable power supply assess reliability across a range of load scenarios, taking into account demand forecasts, current and planned sources of energy and the condition of equipment on the power grid.
If reliability standards are not met, independent power units assess energy prices, and seek sources to be able to meet demand, which bolsters reliability. Taiwan’s power reliability stands at 999, with outages occurring at a rate of less than 0.1 percent.
There are three main categories of outages: Planned outages to install equipment or conduct maintenance; sudden outages, ie, due to accidents; and supply shortages caused by construction delays or to facilitate long-term planning.
This means that shortages lead to outages, but outages are not necessarily because of shortages.
If there is an outage without advanced notice to the public, it affects society to a great extent — especially if it lasts a long time — so power grid resilience is of utmost importance.
Operational stability must account for economic and security considerations. Purchasing energy from the private sector helps to lower the loads major units have to bear, which might keep them from tripping and causing an outage.
Taiwan once had 10 percent of its power generation capacity used less than 3 percent of the time, but as people have resisted power facilities being built in their communities — and amid a situation of equipment sitting idle much of the time or operating on a long-term, but low-efficiency basis — purchasing power from the private sector for NT$10 per kilowatt-hour is not unreasonable at all given the cost of maintenance and fuel, as well as the environmental impact of generating that power during peak times.
Lu Chan-nan is a professor in National Sun Yat-sen University’s Electrical Engineering Department and a former president of the Taiwan Power and Energy Engineering Association.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS