A legislator recently asked the government: If there is no “power shortage” as the government says, why does it have to purchase electricity from the private sector? Why does Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) offer private companies as much as NT$10 per kilowatt-hour? Why are energy bills increasing?
In the American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan’s AmCham Taiwan White Paper this year, it acknowledges the government’s commitment to green energy, but added that emulating the US’ energy policy would give Taiwan a performance boost.
Former US secretary of energy Steven Chu (朱棣文), a Nobel laureate, in 2009 said that reducing peaks in demand is paramount, as 10 percent of generation assets are needed less than 5 percent of the time.
In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the US Congress ordered the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to assess demand response capacity — namely the purchase of electricity from the private sector — and to make an annual report. This amount, including all of the energy accessible for different types of users, reached 30 gigawatts in 2020, or about the net capacity of 30 nuclear generating units.
Aside from power outages in extreme weather, foreign investors do not expect the US to face long-term power shortages due to its policy of purchasing energy from private companies.
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生), who is Taipower’s interim chairman, said that Taiwan is not facing a power shortage, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) has said: “We can only believe the government when it says we have enough energy.”
In advanced economies, agencies responsible for providing stable power supply assess reliability across a range of load scenarios, taking into account demand forecasts, current and planned sources of energy and the condition of equipment on the power grid.
If reliability standards are not met, independent power units assess energy prices, and seek sources to be able to meet demand, which bolsters reliability. Taiwan’s power reliability stands at 999, with outages occurring at a rate of less than 0.1 percent.
There are three main categories of outages: Planned outages to install equipment or conduct maintenance; sudden outages, ie, due to accidents; and supply shortages caused by construction delays or to facilitate long-term planning.
This means that shortages lead to outages, but outages are not necessarily because of shortages.
If there is an outage without advanced notice to the public, it affects society to a great extent — especially if it lasts a long time — so power grid resilience is of utmost importance.
Operational stability must account for economic and security considerations. Purchasing energy from the private sector helps to lower the loads major units have to bear, which might keep them from tripping and causing an outage.
Taiwan once had 10 percent of its power generation capacity used less than 3 percent of the time, but as people have resisted power facilities being built in their communities — and amid a situation of equipment sitting idle much of the time or operating on a long-term, but low-efficiency basis — purchasing power from the private sector for NT$10 per kilowatt-hour is not unreasonable at all given the cost of maintenance and fuel, as well as the environmental impact of generating that power during peak times.
Lu Chan-nan is a professor in National Sun Yat-sen University’s Electrical Engineering Department and a former president of the Taiwan Power and Energy Engineering Association.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of