The US Indo-Pacific Command said that a Chinese warship cut across the path of a US destroyer and a Canadian Navy frigate doing a routine transit in the Taiwan Strait on June 3.
China’s ship, a guided-missile destroyer, crossed the bow of the USS Chung-Hoon at 137m, forcing the US vessel to slow its course to “avoid collision.”
The incident came on the heels of a Chinese fighter jet on May 26 flying in front of the nose of a US Air Force RC-135 aircraft conducting routine operations over the hotly contested South China Sea, which the US Indo-Pacific Command condemned as an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” in the air. Details regarding the two close encounters by the US and Canada were revealed to warn the international community of China’s “unsafe and unprofessional” maneuvers.
However, the two partners would continue with their routine patrols in the Indo-Pacific in accordance with the freedom of navigation as international law stipulates. As defense ministers and military officials around the globe convened in Singapore for the Shangri-La Dialogue, it is worth investigating the reasons behind China’s escalating provocations.
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chinese Minister of National Defense Li Shangfu (李尚福) were at the annual defense conference. Li’s words at the forum suggested that the US and its allies had created the danger with their patrols, and the intention was to provoke China.
“The best way is for the countries, especially the naval vessels and fighter jets of countries, not to do closing actions around other countries’ territories,” he said. In other words, China is calling on other nations to “mind their own business.”
“We must prevent attempts that try to use those freedom of navigation [patrols], that innocent passage, to exercise hegemony of navigation,” he said.
Li had ample reasons to be on edge, because naval vessels and fighter jets of major players in the international community are showing up in the Indo-Pacific. Germany also threw in its hat by saying it would send two warships to the Indo-Pacific next year.
For the first time ever, and thanks to US President Joe Biden’s promotion of multilateralism since taking office, the idea of uniting global powers to counter China’s ambitions seems to be gaining traction.
Beijing has nobody to blame but itself for international powers deploying a military presence around China. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) pursuit of the Chinese dream — which is to make China the world’s dominant power — through coercion and nationalism. Even after the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 20th National Congress, there are no signs of a slowdown in this trajectory.
As Beijing fully demonstrates the hardline “my way or the highway” approach, other nations have resorted to pressuring actions of close monitoring under the US’ leadership. This is what Li has been calling not “innocent passage,” but “hegemony of navigation” in reality. Thus, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s provocative close encounters can be read as a form of “protest.”
As China, for the moment, does not have the military prowess to follow through with its threats, it can only resort to affronting “acts” and “displays.”
This is most apparent when Li made placating remarks at the forum, such as “working together, both [the US and China] will come out as winners; fighting each other, both will lose, and the world will be hurt as well,” or any conflict between the two nations would bring “unbearable disaster for the world.”
Perhaps we would be annoying the CCP again if we say that they are “appeasing” the US, but it is safe to assume that China, which once proposed a “new type of great power relations” concept in the hope of controlling Taiwan and the world, is now nervous when it provoked the US into rallying up its democratic allies into a coalition to counter China.
With the support of China’s neighbors, and those in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea, Biden has the capacity to unite disparate nations to reign in China, enough to form a coalition to take on a “group conflict” scenario.
As for China, what country has stepped up for it? Russia, which is still trapped in a quagmire of its own making? No nation would forfeit its own interests and welfare so that another invading nation can fulfill its own expansionist ambitions. After two unsafe close encounters, it remains to be seen how China would deal with the invitation to a dialogue between the US and Chinese defense leaders. If it is betting on Washington to extend the olive branch first, it might be in for a long, long wait.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times, the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times.
Translated by Rita Wang
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS