The scandal over tranquilizers being given to preschool children in New Taipei City is becoming increasingly heated. This case, involving feeding narcotics to children to keep them quiet so their teachers could rest, has come as quite a shock.
Media reported that several children have tested positive for residues of two sedative classes — barbiturates and benzodiazepines.
Barbiturates are sedative and hypnotic medications that are legally classed as Schedule 3 restricted medicines and category 3 narcotics. As their half-life is about 100 hours in adults and a little longer in children, the concentration is often too low to detect in a blood test conducted after several days or weeks — it can only be detected by testing a person’s urine or hair.
Benzodiazepines are another class of sedative and hypnotic drug, classed as a category 4 narcotic. Their half-life depends on how long it is effective. They might become undetectable after a few days.
However, the question that concerns most people is how the preschool could obtain controlled drugs so easily, while government departments cannot source the drugs’ origins.
Media and people interviewed about the incident have said that the barbiturates that were given to the children were obtained from compound or single medicines that physicians prescribed for sick children.
This opinion requires clarification. Medical barbiturates are Schedule 3 restricted medicines, so the person who receives them must present a prescription along with an identity card, and sign for the drugs.
The transaction must be logged. Local government health departments spot-check hospitals and clinics that have received restricted medicines, and those who breach the regulations are fined at least NT$60,000.
Therefore, it is impossible for hospitals and clinics to casually dispense restricted medicines without leaving a paper trail.
It is commonplace for preschools to give children medicine that has been prescribed to them.
However, they would always do so following a doctor’s prescription given to the school by parents. Teachers would never take out a bunch of colorful medicines and feed them to children, let alone those containing controlled drugs of unknown origin.
Therefore, the drugs might have come from someone who obtained them in accordance with National Health Insurance (NHI) regulations: They could have come from a pharmacy that sells drugs illegally on a self-paid basis without registering the transaction, or from a hospital or clinic that illegally dispenses drugs on a self-paid basis — such as through a prescription under the guise of reimbursement — or even from illegal online purchases.
Judicial departments and competent health authorities should trace the source of the drugs as soon as possible and severely punish any lawbreakers.
Until the source of the drugs is found, it would be better not to accuse anyone. No legitimate physician would prescribe sedative hypnotic drugs such as barbiturates to children unless they suffer from epilepsy, nor would they prescribe barbiturates to children suffering from common illnesses.
If they really did prescribe such medicines, their hospital or clinic would upload the prescriptions daily to the NHI’s database.
Details can easily be retrieved from hospital or clinic records where children are treated and from the NHI database. Commentators should desist from idle speculation to avoid spreading fear.
Lin Yung-zen is president of the Taiwan Primary Care Association and a supervisor of the Taiwan Pediatric Association.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this