More than 75 years have passed since the end of World War II hostilities in the Pacific and 71 years since the San Francisco Peace Treaty formally concluded the war in April 1952.
By that treaty, Japan surrendered sovereignty over its 50-year colony of Taiwan, but did not name a recipient. That decision was left to the US, the chief victor in the Pacific.
However, to this day, the official US position remains “undecided.”
This was the start of Taiwan’s role as the elephant in the room.
The UN has grown from 51 original members in October 1945 to its current 193, but Taiwan — with a population that exceeds 70 percent of member states — is denied entry. This means that 138 countries with a smaller population than Taiwan are in the UN, but Taiwan is not.
Why?
Why has Taiwan been denied the “right of self-determination,” a basic UN principle for former colonies? Even East Timor with its minuscule population of 1.3 million has navigated from a Portuguese colony in the former Dutch East Indies to being a part of Indonesia to finally becoming a UN member by 2002.
Taiwan’s past is complicated. It was occupied and suffered martial law and the White Terror under the Republic of China (ROC) in exile. Its people democratized and freely elected their first legislature in 1992 and president in 1996, but they kept the name of that past occupying government.
To complicate matters more, there is also the People’s Republic of China (PRC), a nation established in 1949, four years after the end of World War II. It eventually became a UN member in 1971, when the followers of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) were expelled from the UN by Resolution 2758.
Unfortunately, in that expulsion, no mention was made of the Taiwanese colonials who were still suffering under martial law imposed by Chiang’s government in exile.
At present, technically only 13 nations recognize the ROC/Taiwan, yet 146 countries grant those holding a Taiwanese passport visa-free entry or a visa upon arrival. Fewer than half that number give PRC passport holders visa-free or visa-upon-arrival entry.
In addition, many of the 146 nations adhere to a “one China” policy, but it is doubtful that they know the difference between the “one China policy” and the “one China principle.” Nor do they know that holding a “one China policy” would not be at odds with a “one Taiwan policy.”
Yes, Taiwan remains the elephant in the room.
In the past few weeks, the news had been filled with nation after nation asking that Taiwan be allowed to participate at the World Health Assembly (WHA). Taiwan showed itself to be a much more responsible player in the COVID-19 crisis than China was. Its contributions have been invaluable, yet the PRC continues to block its entry or even participation in the WHO.
Now a new problem is on the stage. The PRC is once again promoting that it alone has the right to determine right of passage through the Taiwan Strait.
Ironically, Taiwan as a free, democratic nation meets all the criteria of the Montevideo Convention. Is it not time for other nations to face this reality and acknowledge the elephant in the room? This problem is not going to go away.
China has no legitimate claim to Taiwan, even though like a dodgy relative intent on worming their way into an inheritance, it covets Taiwan. Taiwan occupies a valuable geopolitical location for the PRC’s hegemonic ambitions.
In addition, throughout its history, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has followed a dictum of Mao Zedong (毛澤東): “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
The CCP drove the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) into exile with the barrel of a gun; it took over Tibet and Xinjiang with the barrel of a gun, and would have taken over Mongolia if the then-Soviet Union had not prevented it. Moscow wanted a buffer between itself and the PRC.
At this point, to justify the CCP’s intent, some will always try to drag in the dog-eared 1943 Cairo and 1945 Potsdam declarations.
The declarations were mere press releases and were trumped by the actual and final 1952 San Francisco Treaty. Why? By 1950, the PRC had exposed its true hegemonic designs for Asia through its actions in the Korean War.
Certainly, with 75 years gone by, it is time for the nations of the world to admit to and face the elephant in the room. Otherwise, as the PRC gets stronger, it will continue to push its hegemonic envelope.
The denials of Taiwan’s participation at the WHA and the WHO foreshadow what Beijing desires. Control of the South and East China seas, and the Taiwan Strait remains the end game.
The events in Ukraine have shown how Russia, a related Marxist/Leninist country, salami-sliced its way into war. By 1996, Ukraine had surrendered all of its nuclear weapons to Russia. In exchange, it was promised economic and territorial security.
However, in 2014, Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula and last year invaded Ukraine. Such was the hegemonic falsehood of past assurances of security.
The Taiwan challenge must be recognized for what it is. This problem will only get worse with time as Taiwan’s geopolitical importance and its strong semiconductor production increases in value.
Other nations must face the elephant in the room. China will always find a way to be offended. If the PRC can send spy balloons over the US and spy on the US from Cuba, the US and its allies can reply in kind.
A simple way would be for naval vessels of the US, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and others to begin making port calls in Kaohsiung and Keelung. Such friendly visits would send an unspoken message that Taiwan, the elephant in the room, is a free and independent nation.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS