Weeding out narco-nurseries
Anger over reports about a kindergarten in New Taipei City giving sedatives to children continues to grow. On Friday last week, Vice Premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) said during an interview that the government is looking into its administrative processes to see whether a lack of oversight was involved.
Cheng added that the incident should never have been allowed to happen in the first place, and that after it had occurred there should not have been a delay of 25 days before anything was done about it.
It was only on Thursday last week that the city government revoked the school’s license after the case was investigated and it received the documents.
At least one doctor has raised suspicions that this might not be an isolated case, that it could just be the tip of the iceberg — an “unspeakable secret” among kindergarten teachers.
How can it be that kindergarten teachers could have such easy access to controlled, high-risk drugs? How could they have the audacity to use them on children, without stopping to think about the gravity of what they were doing? And why is it that the New Taipei City Education Bureau delayed intervention for weeks after being notified?
The kindergarten teachers who gave the sedatives to the children in their charge should be punished according to the law, but at the same time it is important to address the underlying systemic problems that allowed the incident to happen in the first place.
It is crucial that the culprits are held accountable to ensure that our children and grandchildren can grow up safely without their health being harmed.
Tsai Mei-chu
New Taipei City
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and