Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on Tuesday announced plans to expand production capacity in Tainan for its most advanced 3-nanometer chips. It also announced plans to build 2-nanometer plants in Hsinchu and Taichung, with operations scheduled to start in 2025.
TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) told the firm’s annual general meeting in Hsinchu that he hopes Taiwan’s semiconductor industry would have “a stabilizing effect on global geopolitical conflict.”
After all, China and the US “hope that TSMC is around,” Liu said.
TSMC is often touted as the biggest part of Taiwan’s “silicon shield” and among all the talk of impending doom due to a hypothesized invasion by China, investors and multinationals continue to demonstrate faith in Taiwan’s continued prosperity.
Nobody confused about the apparent contradiction between portents of Armageddon and investor tenacity would have been surprised by a report by the Nikkei Asia published on April 27 that said multinational corporations are including provisions in contracts covering a possible conflict in the Taiwan Strait, business disruptions caused by cross-strait tensions and US sanctions affecting assets in Taiwan if Washington were to say they were under Beijing’s control after an invasion.
Even the whiff of cross-strait tensions sets investors on edge, but the repercussions of actual hostilities breaking out, as Liu alluded to, are something that nobody wants, be they Taiwanese, the Chinese Communist Party or the international community.
The Global Economic Disruptions From a Taiwan Conflict report published by the Rhodium Group in December last year offered what it called a partial and conservative analysis of the outcome of a hypothetical conflict in the Taiwan Strait, which it said would start with “a blockade of Taiwan by China that halts all trade between Taiwan and the rest of the world.” A blockade would put “well over” US$2 trillion of annual economic activity at risk, even before military escalation or the imposition of international sanctions, the report said.
In addition to the economic shock within China, foreign investors dumping Chinese securities, the tightening of capital controls by Beijing to prevent investors from moving money offshore and the probable pause of financing for Belt and Road Initiative projects, by far the biggest effect would be from the strangled supply of chips from Taiwan, and the massive disruption and shortages it would bring to downstream industries, Rhodium said.
These are just predictions of economic disruptions. The clash between China and allies coming to Taiwan’s defense would be far worse, but awareness of the likely economic disruptions has rallied significant sections of the international community to voice support for Taiwan and stress the importance of maintaining peace.
This is part of a process Beijing refers to as the “internationalization” of the Taiwan issue. While internationalization is a catalyst for awareness of Taiwan’s plight and importance, it also increases tensions. Beijing is not happy with the internationalization of a relationship that it has worked so hard to portray as an “internal matter.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) believes that pandering to Beijing’s portrayal is the best way to ensure peace, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), especially under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), believes that internationalization is the best way forward.
How will next year’s presidential election — presuming it is either a KMT or DPP victory — change the calculus? If Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) genuinely prefers a peaceful solution — to avoid the insanity of war and the massive, crippling disruptions it would bring — would he be willing to negotiate with a DPP government?
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS