Uganda is one of the youngest and fastest growing countries in the world. Nearly half of its 45 million-strong population in 2020 were under 14. About 75 percent were under 30. Total numbers are projected to grow to 141 million by 2065.
Against this extraordinarily fecund demographic backdrop, fears expressed by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni that homosexuality threatens the “procreation of the human race” appear absurdly and offensively misplaced.
Museveni, 78, cannot be counted among these new Ugandan generations. He has been in charge since 1986, having seized power in a violent coup. In 2005, he agreed to the creation of a multiparty democracy, but his authoritarian grip on the country has never relaxed. Corruption and intimidation of political opponents are rife. Vote-fixing and fraud have marred successive elections, according to the UK, the EU and the US.
Illustration: Mountain People
PRESIDENT FOR LIFE
Museveni plainly cares little for the poor opinions of Western governments still tainted, in his mind at least, by the colonial past. And, sadly for Ugandans keen to build a free, open and democratic society that respects the rights and choices of all its members, he shows no sign of retiring. In 2017, he removed the legal age limit for presidential candidates.
Yet the extent to which this anachronistic figure is out of time and out of date is vividly underscored by his latest, most grotesque excess: last week’s adoption of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQ+ law, which imposes the death penalty or life imprisonment for certain homosexual acts.
“Recruitment, promotion and funding” of same-sex “activities” might incur up to 20 years in jail, “attempted aggravated homosexuality” 14 years.
Consider the implications. Is a smile, a hug or a kiss a criminal offense in Museveni’s Uganda if shared with a non-state-approved person? Is it illegal to fall in love? And what should a parent do if a child shows signs of what the president calls “deviations”? Shop him or her to the morality police? How disgusting.
The fact that all but two of the Ugandan parliament’s 389 lawmakers voted for the law, known as the Anti-Homosexuality Act, shows that homophobia is sadly prevalent among the nation’s elite. However, his cronies’ hackneyed defense — that the strong condemnation issued by US President Joe Biden, the UK and many others is the product of a bullying colonial mindset intent on subverting “African family values” — is both risible and contemptible.
Campaigners say that by rendering discrimination and prejudice respectable, the law undermines universal human rights, including freedom of expression and association. It will inevitably damage Ugandan business, investment and tourism.
Health workers and AIDS organizations, including the Joint UN Program on HIV/AIDS, warn of a more immediate danger. Progress on tackling AIDS and HIV, a serious problem in sub-Saharan Africa, is now “in grave jeopardy,” they say.
“LGBTQi+ people in Uganda increasingly fear for their safety and security, and people are being discouraged from seeking vital health services for fear of attack, punishment and further marginalization,” the AIDS organizations said in a joint statement.
The law will intensify associated stigma — and stigma can be every bit as lethal as the illness itself.
Museveni and supporters say they are defending their traditions and beliefs against the intrusion of alien, Western sociocultural ideas. Yet evidence has emerged that extreme homophobia in Uganda and the region is being whipped up by ultraconservative American evangelical Christians.
In the name of human decency, if for no other reason, Uganda must scrap this obscene piece of legalized bigotry.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
RSS