Things are not going too well for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜). Amid grumblings over the party’s shoddy treatment of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who also sought the KMT nomination, Hou sought out former National Taiwan University (NTU) president Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔), but Kuan said he had no interest in politics, ending speculation of a Hou-Kuan ticket.
Hou then turned to Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), who heads the National Policy Foundation, a KMT think tank. Ko turned down the offer. Former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) declined to act as Hou’s campaign director.
The lukewarm support from fellow KMT members has dealt a blow to Hou’s support ratings. He trails Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
However, Hou has done nothing to appeal to young voters, nor did he participate in a sedan chair procession at a religious festival in Kinmen County along with Ko, Gou or the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate William Lai (賴清德) a few weeks ago. Even KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) appears to have lost interest.
Ko seems to enjoy “flirting” with Gou on the sidelines. Before Hou’s enlistment, Gou and Ko met in private. On the day of the Kinmen procession, Gou briefly met with Lai, while Ko did not. Later that day, Gou and Ko were photographed seated side-by-side looking at the night sky, but both prevaricated when asked what they talked about.
Gou raised a few eyebrows when he promised to fund an army of 80,000 robots to defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion, but was indifferent to Nvidia Corp cofounder and CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) visit to Taiwan, where Huang said that artificial intelligence’s (AI) “iPhone moment” has arrived.
Since Gou says he is concerned with young people and start-up activities, should he not at least show some interest in AI?
Bonnie Glaser, a US expert on China affairs, told a Brookings Institution forum in Washington that compared with Hou, Ko had a track record of handling relations with China, which meant that Beijing would be “more comfortable” supporting him.
However, Ko twisted Glaser’s words, saying that she means “he is the one most capable of communicating with China and the US,” which Glaser pushed back by calling Ko “dishonest.”
Regardless of the change in polls or support ratings, Ko is a force to be reckoned with in this campaign.
So far, Ko’s role has been to lambast the DPP and KMT for their unsatisfactory performance or scandals. He has no vision of his own, and is best known for repeating Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family” idea. Given this, it is safe to assume that he does not object to unification. He should be able to garner support from the “deep-blue” voters, China supporters and perhaps Gou’s backers. He could also appeal to the pan-green camp, as he used to be the leader of former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) personal medical team. Due to this history, Ko once called himself “black green” and has won favor with a percentage of Chen’s fans.
On the other hand, Gou has said that he would do his best to promote solidarity in the KMT, so how exactly does he plan to collaborate with Ko?
Perhaps he will give spiritual and financial support, or join Ko on his ticket, although it is difficult to say who will be on top. As the TPP chairman, Ko is used to giving orders; as the head of a huge enterprise, Gou is no stranger to being head honcho. As Ko has the considerable advantage of having a party behind him, it might all boil down to how much Gou desires the presidency.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS