On May 28, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said that government agencies were deliberating on the feasibility of maintaining closed nuclear reactors in case of an emergency.
I cannot agree with such a plan.
Laws regarding nuclear power do not apply to an emergency. Unless the laws are amended, Lai’s plan cannot be put into practice. Besides, without careful management, it risks a nuclear catastrophe.
Taiwan relies on imported fuel, including for its nuclear generators. If a blockade of the Taiwan Strait happens, nuclear power would not be an option.
Nuclear power is dependent on other sources of energy: Nuclear reactors would not and cannot work independently.
Moreover, nuclear power can only generate electricity, but society needs other kinds of fuel, including gasoline and diesel, and natural gas.
In terms of wartime security, a nuclear plant or any other massive power facility would easily be targeted by the enemy. It is therefore imperative to develop more power generation facilities and move toward a decentralized power distribution system. Only by doing so can Taiwan enhance the security and stability of its energy supplies.
Unlike nuclear power, renewable energy is self-generated and the development process is decentralized. The electricity generated from renewable sources is diversified — gas, liquid and solid, which is what Taiwan should rely on in an attack or a blockade.
More importantly, renewable sources of energy would never lead to a nuclear disaster, nor would they produce nuclear waste. They have low carbon emissions and are sustainable, which would help Taiwan become a non-nuclear homeland with net zero emissions.
Taiwan should invest more in developing renewable energy to achieve energy independence while bolstering supply security.
Moreover, the homeland would be truly nuclear-free.
Shih Shin-min is founding chairman of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Emma Liu
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS