Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was last month invited to deliver a speech at National Chengchi University, where he caused an uproar by saying that if university graduates cannot earn a high starting salary, the departments from which they graduate should be downsized.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) said that university is first and foremost for students to learn how to make a living. Chang’s reminder is worth thinking about.
The starting salary of university graduates depends on many factors, with industrial structure and workforce demand playing an important role. Either way, university departments and their curriculums should enable students to embark on their careers after they graduate.
The education students receive should also help them improve themselves, earn promotions and develop their skills in different fields. In other words, university departments should offer “basic vocational education.”
According to the Technical and Vocational Education Act (技術及職業教育法), basic vocational education aims to “provide students with the professional knowledge, skills, and professional ethics and self-restraint required to join the workforce, and establish a sense of pride in their future technical or vocational profession.”
However, not a single word is mentioned about vocational training in the University Act (大學法).
Article 1 states: “Universities shall have as their objectives conducting academic research, training and educating highly skilled people, enhancing culture, serving society, and boosting national development.”
The statement is not wrong, but it should be made clear to university students that eventually they must find a job and earn a living.
The current laws imply that university students should devote themselves only to the pursuit of knowledge, and that they should attend graduate schools to obtain a master’s and doctoral degrees. Students have no idea what will happen after they complete their studies.
Vocational schools’ mottos often demonstrate the objective of cultivating students through basic vocational education.
My alma mater, the Affiliated Industrial Vocational High School of National Changhua University of Education, has the motto of “Honesty, Integrity, Professionalism, Excellence.” Students are expected to acquire professional expertise (knowledge) and practical skills (technique). They should also base what they have learned on honesty and integrity. This is in accordance with the Technical and Vocational Education Act.
After my classmates and I graduated, we chose different career paths, but all of us have adhered to the school motto and contributed whatever we could to society.
Most vocational schools, as well as technical and vocational colleges and universities, have maintained the goal of offering basic vocational education to students.
Many university students look down upon basic vocational education, believing that it is only meant for students attending technical and vocational schools.
The truth is that in medical schools, which are the hardest to get in through college entrance examinations, every student is required to complete their internship before becoming a licensed doctor of medicine. Being a medical intern is essentially a part of basic vocational education.
Similarly, to become a licensed lawyer, artist, athlete or healthcare worker, one needs to go through the process of basic vocational training. Students from those departments usually do not have difficulty landing a job, although the starting salary varies from person to person.
If a university department does not provide any plan for vocational education, students are certain to feel confused and uncertain about their future.
The issue of a low starting salary is not merely an educational problem. That said, all university departments should make an effort to offer basic vocational education for students.
Teachers should also highlight the connections between education and career training, so that students can utilize the assistance they need and be at ease.
Huang Rong-wen is an adjunct professor at National Changhua University of Education and a former principal of the Affiliated Industrial Vocational High School of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS