Taiwan is an APEC member and has for decades been a member of the WTO, but has not in recent years joined other regional trade blocs, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This is due to political factors — especially member states’ concerns about tensions across the Taiwan Strait. At the same time, Taiwan faces obstacles in signing bilateral free-trade agreements with many other countries, having inked such deals with just a few countries such as Singapore and New Zealand.
The CPTPP is mainly composed of APEC member states, and its purpose is to promote market liberalization and achieve free trade. The RCEP is mainly composed of ASEAN member countries with the main goal of reducing tariffs and eliminating trade barriers. What is worth noting is that the US has remained absent from the CPTPP and the RCEP, even though Washington still aims to engage more with the Asia-Pacific region.
Instead, US President Joe Biden announced Washington’s plans for an Indo-Pacific Economic Framework at the East Asia Summit in October 2021. The Washington-led regional economic initiative was formally established in Tokyo in May last year, an indication that the US wants to deepen its integration with the Indo-Pacific region by collaborating with its democratic partners. Taiwan has not been invited to become a member of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, but the signing of an initial agreement under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade last week seemed to symbolize Taiwan’s inclusion in the framework.
The Cabinet’s Office of Trade Negotiations views the initial trade agreement between Taiwan and the US as the first fruit of the most wide-ranging and comprehensive trade negotiations conducted by Taipei and Washington since 1979. The agreement represents a historic milestone in the two countries’ trade relationship and serves as a critical step toward signing similar trade agreements with other major trading nations. It would also provide Taiwan with more opportunities to take part in regional trade blocs, including the CPTPP, the office said.
The initial agreement covers five chapters on customs and trade facilitation, regulatory practices, domestic regulation of services, anti-corruption practices, and small and medium-sized enterprises. Its main elements are measures to facilitate trade and investment flows, and expedite customs clearances of Taiwanese products in the US. The agreement focuses on administrative efficiency and does not cover tariff reductions or exemptions.
The two sides are expected to continue negotiations on the remaining seven chapters of the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade, which range from agriculture, digital trade and labor to the environment, state-owned enterprises and nonmarket practices. Some officials and economists have said it is hoped that after negotiations on all 12 chapters have been completed, there would be a chance of signing a free-trade agreement, although Washington has not expressed an interest in signing any such deal with Taipei.
Therefore, the government should work on the practical aspects and first wait to see concrete results from the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade. Instead of fantasizing about a Taiwan-US free-trade agreement in an unspecified future, the government should pave the way for more in-depth and constructive bilateral trade talks with the US to deal with issues that stand in the way of mutual investment, such as eliminating double taxation.
The government could also use the initiative as a stepping stone toward signing bilateral trade agreements with other countries, and therefore avoid marginalization.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS