Taiwan is an APEC member and has for decades been a member of the WTO, but has not in recent years joined other regional trade blocs, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This is due to political factors — especially member states’ concerns about tensions across the Taiwan Strait. At the same time, Taiwan faces obstacles in signing bilateral free-trade agreements with many other countries, having inked such deals with just a few countries such as Singapore and New Zealand.
The CPTPP is mainly composed of APEC member states, and its purpose is to promote market liberalization and achieve free trade. The RCEP is mainly composed of ASEAN member countries with the main goal of reducing tariffs and eliminating trade barriers. What is worth noting is that the US has remained absent from the CPTPP and the RCEP, even though Washington still aims to engage more with the Asia-Pacific region.
Instead, US President Joe Biden announced Washington’s plans for an Indo-Pacific Economic Framework at the East Asia Summit in October 2021. The Washington-led regional economic initiative was formally established in Tokyo in May last year, an indication that the US wants to deepen its integration with the Indo-Pacific region by collaborating with its democratic partners. Taiwan has not been invited to become a member of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, but the signing of an initial agreement under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade last week seemed to symbolize Taiwan’s inclusion in the framework.
The Cabinet’s Office of Trade Negotiations views the initial trade agreement between Taiwan and the US as the first fruit of the most wide-ranging and comprehensive trade negotiations conducted by Taipei and Washington since 1979. The agreement represents a historic milestone in the two countries’ trade relationship and serves as a critical step toward signing similar trade agreements with other major trading nations. It would also provide Taiwan with more opportunities to take part in regional trade blocs, including the CPTPP, the office said.
The initial agreement covers five chapters on customs and trade facilitation, regulatory practices, domestic regulation of services, anti-corruption practices, and small and medium-sized enterprises. Its main elements are measures to facilitate trade and investment flows, and expedite customs clearances of Taiwanese products in the US. The agreement focuses on administrative efficiency and does not cover tariff reductions or exemptions.
The two sides are expected to continue negotiations on the remaining seven chapters of the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade, which range from agriculture, digital trade and labor to the environment, state-owned enterprises and nonmarket practices. Some officials and economists have said it is hoped that after negotiations on all 12 chapters have been completed, there would be a chance of signing a free-trade agreement, although Washington has not expressed an interest in signing any such deal with Taipei.
Therefore, the government should work on the practical aspects and first wait to see concrete results from the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade. Instead of fantasizing about a Taiwan-US free-trade agreement in an unspecified future, the government should pave the way for more in-depth and constructive bilateral trade talks with the US to deal with issues that stand in the way of mutual investment, such as eliminating double taxation.
The government could also use the initiative as a stepping stone toward signing bilateral trade agreements with other countries, and therefore avoid marginalization.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS