As artificial intelligence (AI) drives demand for more advanced semiconductors, new techniques in AI are becoming crucial to continued progress in chip manufacturing.
The entire semiconductor supply chain, from design through to fabrication, is now dominated by data. More than 100 petabytes of information is created and collated during the manufacturing process, according to one estimate by Intel Corp. That is equivalent to a 170-year-long YouTube video.
Data analytics and machine learning, a discipline within AI, is so integral to the process of making and testing chips that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) employs dozens of AI engineers and has its own machine-learning department. Whereas humans were once trained to visually inspect a chip for defects, the small scale and increasing complexity of electronic components has seen that function handed over to AI systems.
Photolithography is one of the most critical steps. This is the process of shining a light through a glass mask onto a chemically treated slice of silicon to create a circuit. It is similar to old-school photography where a final print is developed in a darkroom.
The problem is that light diffracts, which means that the lines actually drawn on the surface of a chip differ from the mask’s pattern. At larger geometries these flaws did not matter too much because the design had enough wiggle room to still be functional, but as dimensions shrunk in line with Moore’s Law, tolerance for errors disappeared.
For decades engineers tackled these distortions by deploying a technique called optical proximity correction (OPC), which adds extra shapes to the original design so that the final result more closely matches the intended circuitry.
Today’s chips have connections as thin as 5 nanometers, 20 times smaller than the COVID-19 virus, spurring the need for new approaches. Thankfully the errors between design and result are not entirely random. Engineers can predict the variations by working backward: Start with what you hope to achieve and crunch a lot of numbers to work out what the photolithography mask should look like to achieve it.
This technique, called inverse lithography, was pioneered 20 years ago by Peng Danping (彭丹平) at Silicon Valley software start-up Luminescent. That Peng, who since moved to TSMC as a director of engineering, completed his doctorate not in electrical engineering, but applied mathematics hints at the data-centric nature of inverse lithography technology (ILT).
With hundreds of parameters to consider — such as light intensity, wavelength, chemical properties, and width and depth of circuitry — this process is extremely data-intensive. At its core, inverse lithography is a mathematical problem. The design of an ILT mask takes 10 times longer to compute than older OPC-based approaches, with the size of a file holding the pattern up to seven times larger.
Collating data, formulating algorithms and running thousands of mathematical computations is precisely what semiconductors are made for, so it was only a matter of time before AI was deployed to try to more efficiently design AI chips.
It is, in many respects, a very complicated graphics problem. The goal is to build a microscopic 3D structure from multiple layers of 2D images.
Nvidia Corp, which is now the world’s leader in AI chips, started off designing graphics processing units (GPU) for computers 30 years ago. It stumbled upon AI because, like graphics, it is a sector of computing that requires massive amounts of number-crunching power. The company’s central role in AI saw it on Wednesday forecast sales this quarter that surpassed expectations, driving the stock up by about 25 percent in pre-market trading. That pushes it toward a US$1 trillion valuation.
Images on a computer screen are little more than a superfine grid of colored dots. Calculating which to light up as red, green or blue can be done in parallel because each point on the screen is independent of every other dot. For a graphics-heavy computer game to run smoothly, these calculations need to be done quickly and in bulk. While central processing units are good at performing a variety of operations, including juggling multiple tasks at once, modern GPUs are created specifically for parallel computing.
Now Nvidia is using its own graphics processors and a library of software it created to make semiconductor lithography more efficient. In a blog post last year, the California-based company explained that by using its graphics chips, it could run inverse lithography computations 10 times faster than on standard processors. Earlier this year, it upped that estimate, saying its approach could accelerate the process 40-fold. With a suite of design tools and its own algorithms, collectively marketed under the term cuLitho, the company is working with TSMC and semiconductor design-software provider Synopsys Inc.
This collection of software and hardware was not developed by Nvidia for altruistic reasons. The company wants to find more uses for its expensive semiconductors, and it needs to ensure that the process of bringing its chip designs to market remains smooth and as cheap as possible. While we all marvel at the ability of ChatGPT software to write software, we will see the increasing role of AI chips in creating AI chips.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
RSS