Millennials have recently woken up to a tragic reality: We are barreling toward middle age. This transition is marked not only by random shooting pains in our knees, but also by our rise through the corporate ranks and the accompanying desire to utter the phrase “kids these days,” while eye rolling about the antics of Gen Z. In the past two years, it is Gen Z that has become the much-discussed new generation and millennials are throwing around all the go-to insults of them being lazy and entitled.
After the brutal criticism millennials received, we have earned our stripes to engage in the time-honored tradition of disparaging the generation that comes next. Frankly, they are making themselves easy targets with the “quiet quitting” and the “bare minimum Mondays.” Still, we should not discount what they are saying just because of their youth — even if the message is mostly spreading on TikTok.
The way Gen Z demands better boundaries and asks for more at a young age might be an affront to our sensibilities, but each generation brings a fresh perspective to how their labor should be used. Millennials, for example, normalized job hopping when it was clear employers did not fairly compensate or value loyalty.
I am certainly not above throwing a dig at the younger cohort, but I am empathetic to their plight. Millennials came of age in what felt like a broken world. The Great Recession hit as the oldest were 27, which is the same age as the eldest of Gen Z today. The version of the workforce we had been promised when we went to college and took on student loans suddenly evaporated. Underemployment was rampant in our early careers giving rise to side-hustle culture and the gig economy. And by the time we had finally found our financial footing, the housing market was so hot it felt impossible to buy a home.
Gen Z is at the start of their own disillusionment, but they have had significantly more access to information about the plight of their elders thanks to social media and the Internet.
Theirs will be the first generation to have lived their entire lives with the Internet. Going to the library for a school research project is alien to them with the world at their fingertips. They have grown up on social media since before they could even consent to having their images posted. Their world looks nothing like ours, which is why they have completely different desires for the workforce, boundaries, and how to earn a living.
TikTok, Instagram and YouTube have given anyone a platform to be an influencer, which might just be the modern-day entrepreneur. Plus, Gen Z has the cautious optimism that comes with youth. They are establishing their version of cobbling together a comfortable living in an uncertain economy.
The #HustleHarder and #GirlBoss culture that marked the millennial rise in the workplace has largely fallen out of fashion in part due to high rates of burnout and chronic stress. Both terms are often referred to as toxic and frequently said to be an element of corporate, commodified feminism or the worst parts of capitalism.
However, Gen Z seems to be on the cutting edge of their own side hustle. The ability to work remotely opened an opportunity for those with the time, energy and motivation to work two salaried, full-time jobs concurrently. Some leverage time zone differences or focus on positions less likely to be riddled with meetings. The phenomenon, sometimes called polyworking, is different from back in my day when a side hustle meant just a few hours of work on top of a full-time job. You simply could not be in two places at once. The advent of ChatGPT and similar AI could further enhance Gen Z’s knack for polyworking. Just ask the robots to write the first draft of your work while you take a meeting.
It is possible that Gen Z are too early in their careers to worry about the ramifications of being fired from not one, but two full-time jobs. Or perhaps they are already over working for corporate overlords and ready to stick it to them as much and for as long as possible. Or maybe, somewhat unintentionally, they are being hyper-capitalist by taking advantage of demand and looking out for their own bottom line.
Gen Z is also developing a reputation for setting boundaries, pushing back and saying no to managers. It is easy to throw around a term like entitled when a youthful 20-something demands more than you did, but that does not make them wrong. Employers should not have the right to own your time outside of work. Of course, this varies by industry, but far too many industries expect a level of time commitment that is not necessary and not fairly compensated.
Policy changes like salary transparency laws should aid Gen Z in their quest to ask for more, but millennial managers should be part of this fight. We know all too well what it is like to suffer wage stagnation, moving into positions of authority should embolden us to demand more for ourselves and Gen Z. Workplaces do ultimately start to bend toward the next generation. How often were people bringing their dogs to work before millennials started to demand we do so?
I am not so old that I have forgotten how it felt to be disrespected and dismissed early in my career. Coming of age is never an easy transition, but generational warfare in the workplace compounds the problem. It is often the young who drive change because they have a fresh perspective on antiquated behaviors or mistreatment. They have less to lose early in their careers and, therefore, more power to stand up or walk away. Young Boomer and Gen X women paved the way for the access I have received in my career, but I was not wrong to want change and to push back against entrenched behaviors such as glorifying a quick return to the workplace after giving birth or accepting a token woman in a position power as progress. Gen Z is not wrong to want to continue to evolve our society and workforce either.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS