Amid the fierce competition between China and the US over Taiwan, Sabella Abidde, a distinguished professor of political science at Alabama State University and a Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs fellow, offers a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the decline of Western civilization. His analysis sheds light on the significance of democratic values in shaping Taiwan’s future and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Abidde has been in Taipei since January, immersing himself in the complex dynamics of East Asian politics and international relations. As the editor of several notable publications, including China and Taiwan in Africa: The Struggle for Diplomatic Recognition and Hegemony, his insights hold particular weight in the ongoing geopolitical struggle for Taiwan. During an interview on May 19 at National Chengchi University, Abidde highlighted the regenerative powers of Western civilization and their potential impact on the US-China competition. He argued persuasively that Western civilization, with its emphasis on democracy, human rights and the rule of law, holds the potential to inspire and guide Taiwan in its pursuit of sovereignty and self-determination.
“The battle for Taiwan goes beyond mere military confrontation; it represents a contest of ideologies and values,” Abidde said. “The regenerative powers of Western civilization, rooted in its unwavering commitment to democracy and individual freedoms, provide Taiwan with a compelling alternative amidst the pressures imposed by China’s assertiveness.”
While acknowledging China’s remarkable economic and technological advancements, Abidde cautioned against underestimating the intrinsic value of Western civilization’s contributions, even to China’s rise. He pointed to the historical achievements of Western democracies in fostering economic prosperity, safeguarding human rights and promoting social justice as evidence of the regenerative capabilities of Western ideals. He also underscored Taiwan’s own significance as a thriving democracy with a vibrant civil society, emphasizing how it serves as a testament to the transformative power of Western civilization. Considering this, he emphasized the vital role the US, as a champion of democratic values, should play in strengthening its support for Taiwan amid China’s growing influence.
“The United States has a crucial role in upholding the principles of Western civilization and ensuring the continuation of Taiwan’s democratic progress,” Abidde said. “By doing so, it not only protects a valued ally, but also reinforces the notion that democracy and individual liberties are universal aspirations.”
Abidde’s analysis offers a unique perspective on the ongoing competition over Taiwan, contrasting with the views of authors who argue for the decline of Western societies and the rise of potential competitors, notably China. While aligning with academics like Francis Fukuyama, Ian Morris and Niall Ferguson, Abidde emphasizes the regenerative powers of Western civilization. However, his perspective stands in contrast to Oswald Spengler’s cyclical view of history, Samuel Huntington’s focus on cultural clashes and Arnold Toynbee’s comprehensive analysis. By highlighting the potential for regeneration, Abidde underscores the importance of democratic values in shaping the future of Taiwan and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Engaging with diverse viewpoints enriches our understanding of the complexities involved in the battle for Taiwan and the broader geopolitical landscape. As we navigate an ever-changing world, it is crucial to consider the multifaceted factors that contribute to the decline and potential revitalization of Western civilization.
Richard Atimniraye Nyelade is a sociology-anthropology lecturer at the University of Ottawa and a visiting scholar at National Chengchi University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then