Amid the fierce competition between China and the US over Taiwan, Sabella Abidde, a distinguished professor of political science at Alabama State University and a Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs fellow, offers a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the decline of Western civilization. His analysis sheds light on the significance of democratic values in shaping Taiwan’s future and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Abidde has been in Taipei since January, immersing himself in the complex dynamics of East Asian politics and international relations. As the editor of several notable publications, including China and Taiwan in Africa: The Struggle for Diplomatic Recognition and Hegemony, his insights hold particular weight in the ongoing geopolitical struggle for Taiwan. During an interview on May 19 at National Chengchi University, Abidde highlighted the regenerative powers of Western civilization and their potential impact on the US-China competition. He argued persuasively that Western civilization, with its emphasis on democracy, human rights and the rule of law, holds the potential to inspire and guide Taiwan in its pursuit of sovereignty and self-determination.
“The battle for Taiwan goes beyond mere military confrontation; it represents a contest of ideologies and values,” Abidde said. “The regenerative powers of Western civilization, rooted in its unwavering commitment to democracy and individual freedoms, provide Taiwan with a compelling alternative amidst the pressures imposed by China’s assertiveness.”
While acknowledging China’s remarkable economic and technological advancements, Abidde cautioned against underestimating the intrinsic value of Western civilization’s contributions, even to China’s rise. He pointed to the historical achievements of Western democracies in fostering economic prosperity, safeguarding human rights and promoting social justice as evidence of the regenerative capabilities of Western ideals. He also underscored Taiwan’s own significance as a thriving democracy with a vibrant civil society, emphasizing how it serves as a testament to the transformative power of Western civilization. Considering this, he emphasized the vital role the US, as a champion of democratic values, should play in strengthening its support for Taiwan amid China’s growing influence.
“The United States has a crucial role in upholding the principles of Western civilization and ensuring the continuation of Taiwan’s democratic progress,” Abidde said. “By doing so, it not only protects a valued ally, but also reinforces the notion that democracy and individual liberties are universal aspirations.”
Abidde’s analysis offers a unique perspective on the ongoing competition over Taiwan, contrasting with the views of authors who argue for the decline of Western societies and the rise of potential competitors, notably China. While aligning with academics like Francis Fukuyama, Ian Morris and Niall Ferguson, Abidde emphasizes the regenerative powers of Western civilization. However, his perspective stands in contrast to Oswald Spengler’s cyclical view of history, Samuel Huntington’s focus on cultural clashes and Arnold Toynbee’s comprehensive analysis. By highlighting the potential for regeneration, Abidde underscores the importance of democratic values in shaping the future of Taiwan and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Engaging with diverse viewpoints enriches our understanding of the complexities involved in the battle for Taiwan and the broader geopolitical landscape. As we navigate an ever-changing world, it is crucial to consider the multifaceted factors that contribute to the decline and potential revitalization of Western civilization.
Richard Atimniraye Nyelade is a sociology-anthropology lecturer at the University of Ottawa and a visiting scholar at National Chengchi University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS