As the first group of 12-year curriculum students are about to complete their first year in university, science and engineering students at top-ranking universities such as National Taiwan University and National Tsing Hua University are reportedly not doing well. Their average scores, especially in general physics, general chemistry and calculus, have declined, the reports said.
As a mathematics teacher at a technical university and vocational high school, I have some thoughts to share.
Before the 12-year curriculum was instituted, trigonometry, complex numbers, inequalities and conic sections were taught as a single unit. Now, these units are distributed across different semesters, making it difficult for teachers to explain these concepts comprehensively and effectively.
As a result, first-year students forget everything when they start their second year and teachers have to start from scratch. This limits the time that can be devoted to learning other units. To solve this problem, some schools asked textbook publishers to revise the content according to the old curriculum, or asked teachers to design their own materials to achieve more satisfying results.
Another factor that has had a great effect on universities is the nation’s low birthrate. In the competition to secure students, some universities try to get a head start by recruiting students who took the General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT) in January rather than the Advanced Subjects Test in July.
In the same way, most students go for the GSAT and complete the admission process through application or recommendation. This practice leaves out some important mathematical subjects that are not covered in the GSAT. Calculus, for example, has been neglected by many teachers and students, despite its importance. Moreover, many students, after taking the GSAT and completing the admission process, just “zone out” and let go for the rest of their high-school days.
Unsurprisingly, some of them find it difficult to catch up with others when they start university.
Many have said that the 12-year curriculum is designed to raise students’ competency. Teaching materials and test questions are then designed with long readings. Students with lower reading ability would naturally feel tired and annoyed, and their willingness to learn and study wane. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of students’ mathematical skills.
Chung Pang-yu is a mathematics teacher at a vocational high school and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion