On Sunday, Recep Tayyip Erdogan was declared the winner of Turkey’s presidential runoff elections. According to numbers reported by the state-owned Anadolu news agency, more than 27 million people cast their ballots in favor of Erdogan, who has been at the country’s helm for more than two decades. He entered the second round in the lead in the polls and was expected by most to emerge victorious.
Although Erdogan captured slightly more than half of the vote, more than 25 million people also mobilized to vote against him.
The elections were being held under deeply unfair conditions, with an opposition set up to fail. Istanbul’s mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu, was recently sentenced to more than two years in prison and banned from holding public office for insulting members of the supreme election council. This left the opposition unable to nominate its maybe most promising candidate.
This was all amid biased media coverage, relentless smear campaigns against the eventual opposition candidate, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, threats, manipulation and a crackdown on civil society, such as the arrest of 126 Kurdish lawyers, rights advocates and politicians at the end of April in Diyarbakir.
Everything was at stake in a country where the judiciary now does little more than rubber-stamp policy dictated by the president.
It would be an understatement to say that for rights defenders, five more years under Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AK) is a daunting prospect. Women’s and LGBTQ+ rights groups especially will find themselves in the immediate line of fire. During his first victory speech in Istanbul last night, Erdoan targeted LGBTQ+ groups again.
“Could those LGBT elements ever find their way into the AK party?” he asked to a resounding “no” from the crowd. “Family is holy to us.”
Ahead of the runoff elections, women’s rights group Left Feminist Movement warned that the choice between Erdogan and Kilicdaroglu was one between “darkness” and “light.”
A statement signed by several dozen well-known female musicians, actors, writers and rights defenders said: “We either succeed in tearing apart the darkness and glimpse the light of dawn, or we will suffocate.”
Many have argued that Turkey has never had a more ultra-conservative and misogynistic parliament than it does now. Two radical Islamist fringe parties have joined the national assembly on Erdogan’s side.
The Justice and Development Party has not only brought the New Welfare Party into its alliance, but also nominated four senior members of the Kurdish Free Cause Party under its parliamentary candidate list. All four were elected to parliament on May 14.
The Free Cause party is closely affiliated with Kurdish Hezbollah, a Sunni militant group that originated in the Turkish southeast and gained notoriety in the 1990s when its members tortured and killed hundreds of Kurdistan Workers’ Party members and supporters, as well as others who opposed its ideology, although it has since officially renounced violence.
Free Cause calls for gender segregation in schools and has argued that state services for women, such as healthcare or education, should only be rendered by female employees.
Meanwhile, in the New Welfare party’s manifesto, it demands that “morals, chastity, mercy, devotion and productivity” should be strengthened among women through female “role models.”
Both parties have aggressively lobbied against LGBTQ+ rights, targeting them as “perversion,” as well as for the criminalization of adultery. They have also vowed to scrap law 6284, introduced by the AK government in 2012, which aims to prevent violence against women.
Women’s rights advocates have accused them of aiming for “Taliban-style” rule.
Despite almost unfettered presidential powers, Erdogan might need the support of these parties to push through legislative changes in parliament. Their presence further normalizes discriminatory attitudes, already rampant among the governing bloc, toward women and LGBTQ+ people inside and outside state politics.
In 2021, Erdoan unilaterally withdrew Turkey from the Istanbul convention, an international treaty to fight gender-based discrimination and violence. Women’s rights groups reported that police officers had refused to assist victims of domestic violence, citing the withdrawal from the convention.
Last year, bogus charges of “acting against morality” were brought against We Will Stop Femicide, a feminist platform that fights gender-based violence and keeps a monthly count of murdered women. If convicted, the group would be shut down.
On Sunday, rights activists said that the election results should not deter people from fighting.
“Our hopes should not be broken, but we need to be aware of the consequences,” We Will Stop Femicide general secretary Fidan Ataselim wrote on Twitter. “We have no other choice than to keep organizing, to give voice to reason and to stick together.”
At the same time, political leaders around the world rushed to congratulate Erdoan on his election win. EU politicians are perhaps a little too relieved that the Turkish president, who has been a willing partner in their project to keep refugees out of EU states, will remain in power.
For them, Kati Piri, a Dutch member of parliament and former Turkey EU rapporteur, had one question: “What’s your message to the 25 million people who voted for restoration of democracy and rule of law?”
Constanze Letsch is a former Turkey correspondent for the Guardian and completed a doctorate on urban renewal in Istanbul.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS