On Sunday, Recep Tayyip Erdogan was declared the winner of Turkey’s presidential runoff elections. According to numbers reported by the state-owned Anadolu news agency, more than 27 million people cast their ballots in favor of Erdogan, who has been at the country’s helm for more than two decades. He entered the second round in the lead in the polls and was expected by most to emerge victorious.
Although Erdogan captured slightly more than half of the vote, more than 25 million people also mobilized to vote against him.
The elections were being held under deeply unfair conditions, with an opposition set up to fail. Istanbul’s mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu, was recently sentenced to more than two years in prison and banned from holding public office for insulting members of the supreme election council. This left the opposition unable to nominate its maybe most promising candidate.
This was all amid biased media coverage, relentless smear campaigns against the eventual opposition candidate, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, threats, manipulation and a crackdown on civil society, such as the arrest of 126 Kurdish lawyers, rights advocates and politicians at the end of April in Diyarbakir.
Everything was at stake in a country where the judiciary now does little more than rubber-stamp policy dictated by the president.
It would be an understatement to say that for rights defenders, five more years under Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AK) is a daunting prospect. Women’s and LGBTQ+ rights groups especially will find themselves in the immediate line of fire. During his first victory speech in Istanbul last night, Erdoan targeted LGBTQ+ groups again.
“Could those LGBT elements ever find their way into the AK party?” he asked to a resounding “no” from the crowd. “Family is holy to us.”
Ahead of the runoff elections, women’s rights group Left Feminist Movement warned that the choice between Erdogan and Kilicdaroglu was one between “darkness” and “light.”
A statement signed by several dozen well-known female musicians, actors, writers and rights defenders said: “We either succeed in tearing apart the darkness and glimpse the light of dawn, or we will suffocate.”
Many have argued that Turkey has never had a more ultra-conservative and misogynistic parliament than it does now. Two radical Islamist fringe parties have joined the national assembly on Erdogan’s side.
The Justice and Development Party has not only brought the New Welfare Party into its alliance, but also nominated four senior members of the Kurdish Free Cause Party under its parliamentary candidate list. All four were elected to parliament on May 14.
The Free Cause party is closely affiliated with Kurdish Hezbollah, a Sunni militant group that originated in the Turkish southeast and gained notoriety in the 1990s when its members tortured and killed hundreds of Kurdistan Workers’ Party members and supporters, as well as others who opposed its ideology, although it has since officially renounced violence.
Free Cause calls for gender segregation in schools and has argued that state services for women, such as healthcare or education, should only be rendered by female employees.
Meanwhile, in the New Welfare party’s manifesto, it demands that “morals, chastity, mercy, devotion and productivity” should be strengthened among women through female “role models.”
Both parties have aggressively lobbied against LGBTQ+ rights, targeting them as “perversion,” as well as for the criminalization of adultery. They have also vowed to scrap law 6284, introduced by the AK government in 2012, which aims to prevent violence against women.
Women’s rights advocates have accused them of aiming for “Taliban-style” rule.
Despite almost unfettered presidential powers, Erdogan might need the support of these parties to push through legislative changes in parliament. Their presence further normalizes discriminatory attitudes, already rampant among the governing bloc, toward women and LGBTQ+ people inside and outside state politics.
In 2021, Erdoan unilaterally withdrew Turkey from the Istanbul convention, an international treaty to fight gender-based discrimination and violence. Women’s rights groups reported that police officers had refused to assist victims of domestic violence, citing the withdrawal from the convention.
Last year, bogus charges of “acting against morality” were brought against We Will Stop Femicide, a feminist platform that fights gender-based violence and keeps a monthly count of murdered women. If convicted, the group would be shut down.
On Sunday, rights activists said that the election results should not deter people from fighting.
“Our hopes should not be broken, but we need to be aware of the consequences,” We Will Stop Femicide general secretary Fidan Ataselim wrote on Twitter. “We have no other choice than to keep organizing, to give voice to reason and to stick together.”
At the same time, political leaders around the world rushed to congratulate Erdoan on his election win. EU politicians are perhaps a little too relieved that the Turkish president, who has been a willing partner in their project to keep refugees out of EU states, will remain in power.
For them, Kati Piri, a Dutch member of parliament and former Turkey EU rapporteur, had one question: “What’s your message to the 25 million people who voted for restoration of democracy and rule of law?”
Constanze Letsch is a former Turkey correspondent for the Guardian and completed a doctorate on urban renewal in Istanbul.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS