In 2020, an estimated 287,000 women died in pregnancy, childbirth or soon after delivering, the latest data from the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group shows. The group includes the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), where I am executive director. This figure is about equivalent to the death toll of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami or the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, two of the deadliest natural disasters in modern history.
Human devastation on such a scale is usually met with weeks of news coverage, an outpouring of public support and calls for urgent action. Yet the staggering number of women dying every year in the act of giving life remains largely a silent crisis. Even more worrying, the group found that progress on reducing maternal deaths has ground to a halt.
How many of us know someone who died, or came close to dying, during pregnancy or childbirth? Perhaps the pervasiveness of suffering is part of the problem — maternal deaths might seem inevitable. Yet the vast majority are preventable with simple interventions that save money in the long run.
Illustration: Yusha
One of the most cost-effective ways to reduce maternal mortality globally is to invest in community-based care, including the education and deployment of midwives. Achieving this would require scaling up the workforce substantially — the world is facing a shortage of 900,000 midwives — and countering persistent gender norms that devalue the contributions of a predominantly female field.
Lowering the high number of unintended pregnancies is another crucial step toward reducing maternal mortality. UNFPA research shows that nearly half of all pregnancies are unintended, more than 60 percent of unintended pregnancies end in abortion and an estimated 45 percent of all abortions are unsafe, making them a leading cause of maternal death.
Policymakers know how to address this issue: Increase access to quality contraceptives, improve comprehensive sexuality education and protect a woman’s right to decide whether, when and with whom to have children.
World leaders have made significant progress when called upon to save women’s lives. In 2000, governments agreed to the Millennium Development Goals, which aimed for a 75 percent reduction in the global maternal mortality rate by 2015. The 44 percent decrease in deaths over that period was a meaningful accomplishment — even if it ultimately fell short of the goal.
In 2015, with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals, countries once again committed to reducing the maternal death ratio, this time to below 70 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2030. Yet, eight years on, we are nowhere near achieving that target, and progress has stalled.
The maternal mortality rate has increased in two regions — Europe and Northern America, and Latin America and the Caribbean — since 2016, and these estimates, which end in 2020, do not account for the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems.
Underinvestment in addressing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in the delivery of maternal healthcare is one factor contributing to this stagnation. In the US, for example, the 2021 maternal mortality rate for black women was 2.6 times the rate for non-Hispanic white women. Similar disparities can be observed in Afro-descendant communities in Latin America and the Caribbean.
A holistic, community-based approach to care is crucial to eliminating these disparities. Early in my career, I worked as a pediatrician and HIV researcher in New York’s Harlem neighborhood when crack cocaine and AIDS were devastating the poorest and most marginalized patients and communities. It became clear that I could not treat a child without understanding the wider social context and the challenges facing their mother. The medical needs of the mothers and pregnant women I met often paled in comparison to the urgency of their social needs, highlighting the importance of treating the whole person.
Even though progress on maternal mortality has stagnated at the global level, there are some glimmers of hope.
For example, Nepal decreased maternal deaths by nearly one-third between 2015 and 2020, after halving the country’s rate between 2000 and 2015. In this period, the government doubled health spending, legalized abortion and made maternity care free of charge.
Similarly, Sri Lanka has halved maternal deaths at least every 12 years since 1935, owing largely to a health system that provides free services to the entire population and to a dramatic increase in the number of skilled midwives, who attend 97 percent of births, compared with 30 percent in 1940.
While the latest maternal mortality rates reveal the damage caused by neglecting lifesaving solutions, there is a way to end this needless suffering. Building midwifery capacity and ensuring equal access to quality sexual and reproductive healthcare would go a long way toward improving health outcomes for mothers and pregnant women.
Getting back on track requires reviving the sense of urgency among governments, communities and all stakeholders needed to provide adequate financing and create a conducive legal and social environment for these interventions. We know the reasons why women still die giving birth. Indifference should not be one of them.
Natalia Kanem is executive director of the UN Population Fund.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS