In 2020, an estimated 287,000 women died in pregnancy, childbirth or soon after delivering, the latest data from the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group shows. The group includes the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), where I am executive director. This figure is about equivalent to the death toll of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami or the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, two of the deadliest natural disasters in modern history.
Human devastation on such a scale is usually met with weeks of news coverage, an outpouring of public support and calls for urgent action. Yet the staggering number of women dying every year in the act of giving life remains largely a silent crisis. Even more worrying, the group found that progress on reducing maternal deaths has ground to a halt.
How many of us know someone who died, or came close to dying, during pregnancy or childbirth? Perhaps the pervasiveness of suffering is part of the problem — maternal deaths might seem inevitable. Yet the vast majority are preventable with simple interventions that save money in the long run.
Illustration: Yusha
One of the most cost-effective ways to reduce maternal mortality globally is to invest in community-based care, including the education and deployment of midwives. Achieving this would require scaling up the workforce substantially — the world is facing a shortage of 900,000 midwives — and countering persistent gender norms that devalue the contributions of a predominantly female field.
Lowering the high number of unintended pregnancies is another crucial step toward reducing maternal mortality. UNFPA research shows that nearly half of all pregnancies are unintended, more than 60 percent of unintended pregnancies end in abortion and an estimated 45 percent of all abortions are unsafe, making them a leading cause of maternal death.
Policymakers know how to address this issue: Increase access to quality contraceptives, improve comprehensive sexuality education and protect a woman’s right to decide whether, when and with whom to have children.
World leaders have made significant progress when called upon to save women’s lives. In 2000, governments agreed to the Millennium Development Goals, which aimed for a 75 percent reduction in the global maternal mortality rate by 2015. The 44 percent decrease in deaths over that period was a meaningful accomplishment — even if it ultimately fell short of the goal.
In 2015, with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals, countries once again committed to reducing the maternal death ratio, this time to below 70 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2030. Yet, eight years on, we are nowhere near achieving that target, and progress has stalled.
The maternal mortality rate has increased in two regions — Europe and Northern America, and Latin America and the Caribbean — since 2016, and these estimates, which end in 2020, do not account for the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems.
Underinvestment in addressing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in the delivery of maternal healthcare is one factor contributing to this stagnation. In the US, for example, the 2021 maternal mortality rate for black women was 2.6 times the rate for non-Hispanic white women. Similar disparities can be observed in Afro-descendant communities in Latin America and the Caribbean.
A holistic, community-based approach to care is crucial to eliminating these disparities. Early in my career, I worked as a pediatrician and HIV researcher in New York’s Harlem neighborhood when crack cocaine and AIDS were devastating the poorest and most marginalized patients and communities. It became clear that I could not treat a child without understanding the wider social context and the challenges facing their mother. The medical needs of the mothers and pregnant women I met often paled in comparison to the urgency of their social needs, highlighting the importance of treating the whole person.
Even though progress on maternal mortality has stagnated at the global level, there are some glimmers of hope.
For example, Nepal decreased maternal deaths by nearly one-third between 2015 and 2020, after halving the country’s rate between 2000 and 2015. In this period, the government doubled health spending, legalized abortion and made maternity care free of charge.
Similarly, Sri Lanka has halved maternal deaths at least every 12 years since 1935, owing largely to a health system that provides free services to the entire population and to a dramatic increase in the number of skilled midwives, who attend 97 percent of births, compared with 30 percent in 1940.
While the latest maternal mortality rates reveal the damage caused by neglecting lifesaving solutions, there is a way to end this needless suffering. Building midwifery capacity and ensuring equal access to quality sexual and reproductive healthcare would go a long way toward improving health outcomes for mothers and pregnant women.
Getting back on track requires reviving the sense of urgency among governments, communities and all stakeholders needed to provide adequate financing and create a conducive legal and social environment for these interventions. We know the reasons why women still die giving birth. Indifference should not be one of them.
Natalia Kanem is executive director of the UN Population Fund.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS