In 2020, an estimated 287,000 women died in pregnancy, childbirth or soon after delivering, the latest data from the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group shows. The group includes the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), where I am executive director. This figure is about equivalent to the death toll of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami or the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, two of the deadliest natural disasters in modern history.
Human devastation on such a scale is usually met with weeks of news coverage, an outpouring of public support and calls for urgent action. Yet the staggering number of women dying every year in the act of giving life remains largely a silent crisis. Even more worrying, the group found that progress on reducing maternal deaths has ground to a halt.
How many of us know someone who died, or came close to dying, during pregnancy or childbirth? Perhaps the pervasiveness of suffering is part of the problem — maternal deaths might seem inevitable. Yet the vast majority are preventable with simple interventions that save money in the long run.
Illustration: Yusha
One of the most cost-effective ways to reduce maternal mortality globally is to invest in community-based care, including the education and deployment of midwives. Achieving this would require scaling up the workforce substantially — the world is facing a shortage of 900,000 midwives — and countering persistent gender norms that devalue the contributions of a predominantly female field.
Lowering the high number of unintended pregnancies is another crucial step toward reducing maternal mortality. UNFPA research shows that nearly half of all pregnancies are unintended, more than 60 percent of unintended pregnancies end in abortion and an estimated 45 percent of all abortions are unsafe, making them a leading cause of maternal death.
Policymakers know how to address this issue: Increase access to quality contraceptives, improve comprehensive sexuality education and protect a woman’s right to decide whether, when and with whom to have children.
World leaders have made significant progress when called upon to save women’s lives. In 2000, governments agreed to the Millennium Development Goals, which aimed for a 75 percent reduction in the global maternal mortality rate by 2015. The 44 percent decrease in deaths over that period was a meaningful accomplishment — even if it ultimately fell short of the goal.
In 2015, with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals, countries once again committed to reducing the maternal death ratio, this time to below 70 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2030. Yet, eight years on, we are nowhere near achieving that target, and progress has stalled.
The maternal mortality rate has increased in two regions — Europe and Northern America, and Latin America and the Caribbean — since 2016, and these estimates, which end in 2020, do not account for the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems.
Underinvestment in addressing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in the delivery of maternal healthcare is one factor contributing to this stagnation. In the US, for example, the 2021 maternal mortality rate for black women was 2.6 times the rate for non-Hispanic white women. Similar disparities can be observed in Afro-descendant communities in Latin America and the Caribbean.
A holistic, community-based approach to care is crucial to eliminating these disparities. Early in my career, I worked as a pediatrician and HIV researcher in New York’s Harlem neighborhood when crack cocaine and AIDS were devastating the poorest and most marginalized patients and communities. It became clear that I could not treat a child without understanding the wider social context and the challenges facing their mother. The medical needs of the mothers and pregnant women I met often paled in comparison to the urgency of their social needs, highlighting the importance of treating the whole person.
Even though progress on maternal mortality has stagnated at the global level, there are some glimmers of hope.
For example, Nepal decreased maternal deaths by nearly one-third between 2015 and 2020, after halving the country’s rate between 2000 and 2015. In this period, the government doubled health spending, legalized abortion and made maternity care free of charge.
Similarly, Sri Lanka has halved maternal deaths at least every 12 years since 1935, owing largely to a health system that provides free services to the entire population and to a dramatic increase in the number of skilled midwives, who attend 97 percent of births, compared with 30 percent in 1940.
While the latest maternal mortality rates reveal the damage caused by neglecting lifesaving solutions, there is a way to end this needless suffering. Building midwifery capacity and ensuring equal access to quality sexual and reproductive healthcare would go a long way toward improving health outcomes for mothers and pregnant women.
Getting back on track requires reviving the sense of urgency among governments, communities and all stakeholders needed to provide adequate financing and create a conducive legal and social environment for these interventions. We know the reasons why women still die giving birth. Indifference should not be one of them.
Natalia Kanem is executive director of the UN Population Fund.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS