The Legislature has finished the third readings of amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法). The long-awaited amendments prevent people convicted of certain crimes — such as organized crime, money laundering, gun smuggling or use, narcotics trafficking, peddling and use, and national security crimes — from running for public office.
Taiwanese should applaud the amendments, as they would help to perfect the nation’s democracy. It is undeniable that gangsters have intervened in Taiwan’s elections many times. If their harmful influence can be curbed by laws, elections can be carried out in a high-principled manner, given that Taiwanese are by nature kind and sincere.
As chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has demonstrated his resolution to bar those with a criminal background from representing the DPP in elections. For this, Lai gained support from the public in opinion polls. This shows what Taiwanese want: All gangsters and their affiliates eliminated from elections.
The amendments were proposed by the DPP. Given that it has a legislative majority, it was only natural that the party fully utilize its advantage and amend the law to eliminate the influence of gangsters in elections.
As Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) has said, a candidate with a criminal background should not be tolerated. The amendments are sure to go a long way to improve the quality of Taiwan’s democracy.
Particularly in local elections, political factions have been controlled by politicians who lack any originality. Their old faces and cliche slogans appear in elections on a regular basis. Some of those politicians are affiliated with gangsters and some even have criminal records.
Their participation in local elections is often supported by illicit money. When they conduct election campaigns, gangsters often manipulate the results, with rampant vote-buying. If such activities can be prevented by law, local elections can be free of corruption and wrongdoing. In this way, Taiwanese can also provide space for young people with fresh visions to realize their political dreams.
Civil servants are supposed to serve the public and the conduct of politicians should be held to an even higher standard. It is therefore perplexing that the opposition party strongly fought against the amendments.
The law should apply to all people regardless of their social status. If common people face penalty when they contravene the law, civil servants and candidates in any kind of elections should abide by the law more strictly. Given that politicians are a part of the state apparatus, they should be more attentive to the law and remain loyal to the nation.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Kuohsing Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion