The Legislature has finished the third readings of amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法). The long-awaited amendments prevent people convicted of certain crimes — such as organized crime, money laundering, gun smuggling or use, narcotics trafficking, peddling and use, and national security crimes — from running for public office.
Taiwanese should applaud the amendments, as they would help to perfect the nation’s democracy. It is undeniable that gangsters have intervened in Taiwan’s elections many times. If their harmful influence can be curbed by laws, elections can be carried out in a high-principled manner, given that Taiwanese are by nature kind and sincere.
As chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has demonstrated his resolution to bar those with a criminal background from representing the DPP in elections. For this, Lai gained support from the public in opinion polls. This shows what Taiwanese want: All gangsters and their affiliates eliminated from elections.
The amendments were proposed by the DPP. Given that it has a legislative majority, it was only natural that the party fully utilize its advantage and amend the law to eliminate the influence of gangsters in elections.
As Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) has said, a candidate with a criminal background should not be tolerated. The amendments are sure to go a long way to improve the quality of Taiwan’s democracy.
Particularly in local elections, political factions have been controlled by politicians who lack any originality. Their old faces and cliche slogans appear in elections on a regular basis. Some of those politicians are affiliated with gangsters and some even have criminal records.
Their participation in local elections is often supported by illicit money. When they conduct election campaigns, gangsters often manipulate the results, with rampant vote-buying. If such activities can be prevented by law, local elections can be free of corruption and wrongdoing. In this way, Taiwanese can also provide space for young people with fresh visions to realize their political dreams.
Civil servants are supposed to serve the public and the conduct of politicians should be held to an even higher standard. It is therefore perplexing that the opposition party strongly fought against the amendments.
The law should apply to all people regardless of their social status. If common people face penalty when they contravene the law, civil servants and candidates in any kind of elections should abide by the law more strictly. Given that politicians are a part of the state apparatus, they should be more attentive to the law and remain loyal to the nation.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Kuohsing Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS