The Legislature has finished the third readings of amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法). The long-awaited amendments prevent people convicted of certain crimes — such as organized crime, money laundering, gun smuggling or use, narcotics trafficking, peddling and use, and national security crimes — from running for public office.
Taiwanese should applaud the amendments, as they would help to perfect the nation’s democracy. It is undeniable that gangsters have intervened in Taiwan’s elections many times. If their harmful influence can be curbed by laws, elections can be carried out in a high-principled manner, given that Taiwanese are by nature kind and sincere.
As chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has demonstrated his resolution to bar those with a criminal background from representing the DPP in elections. For this, Lai gained support from the public in opinion polls. This shows what Taiwanese want: All gangsters and their affiliates eliminated from elections.
The amendments were proposed by the DPP. Given that it has a legislative majority, it was only natural that the party fully utilize its advantage and amend the law to eliminate the influence of gangsters in elections.
As Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) has said, a candidate with a criminal background should not be tolerated. The amendments are sure to go a long way to improve the quality of Taiwan’s democracy.
Particularly in local elections, political factions have been controlled by politicians who lack any originality. Their old faces and cliche slogans appear in elections on a regular basis. Some of those politicians are affiliated with gangsters and some even have criminal records.
Their participation in local elections is often supported by illicit money. When they conduct election campaigns, gangsters often manipulate the results, with rampant vote-buying. If such activities can be prevented by law, local elections can be free of corruption and wrongdoing. In this way, Taiwanese can also provide space for young people with fresh visions to realize their political dreams.
Civil servants are supposed to serve the public and the conduct of politicians should be held to an even higher standard. It is therefore perplexing that the opposition party strongly fought against the amendments.
The law should apply to all people regardless of their social status. If common people face penalty when they contravene the law, civil servants and candidates in any kind of elections should abide by the law more strictly. Given that politicians are a part of the state apparatus, they should be more attentive to the law and remain loyal to the nation.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Kuohsing Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS