To resolve the problem of “low wages and high unemployment” among young people, the Executive Yuan approved the second phase of its Investing in Youth Employment Program, with a budget of NT$16 billion (US$522 million) to help 800,000 young people find jobs.
However, several years after the program was launched in 2019, the unemployment rate among those aged 15 to 29 was still as high as 8.38 percent last year, showing that the problem of low wages and high unemployment remains unsolved.
Experts in the social work sector say that youth employment is a long-term problem that should be addressed in the government’s social welfare policies, which can use diverse methods to promote youth employment through “social facilitation.” Such an approach is better than the Ministry of Labor’s job-matching program for young people.
“Social facilitation” — a phenomenon in which the presence of others improves individual performance — can be adopted by a social welfare system to enable groups such as unemployed youth and women to share the fruits of social development, and to provide equal opportunities for personal development.
Through “employment facilitation,” which mediates the labor market mechanism, the government can exercise state power to intervene in the labor market to increase job opportunities for disadvantaged people, thus protecting workers’ basic rights.
The overall unemployment rate in Taiwan has remained at 3.7 percent since 2010, but the rate among people aged 15 to 29 has been at about 10 percent, which has become the norm in the labor market.
Earlier this month, the Legislative Yuan passed the Social Welfare Basic Act (社會福利基本法). Following the examples of the Indigenous Peoples Employment Rights Protection Act (原住民族工作權保障法) and the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法), the legislature should also create a “youth employment rights protection act” to reserve jobs for young people. This is the way to help them find jobs.
In addition, welfare benefits can be bundled with employment promotion.
Since the 1990s, countries such as the UK and the US have emphasized that welfare recipients must enter the job market. In Taiwan, the Employment Insurance Act (就業保險法) requires that an involuntary unemployed person is required to register with a public employment agency for job placement, and the person is only eligible for such benefits if the agency fails to find a job or arrange vocational training for them. Therefore, the Cabinet’s Investing in Youth Employment Program should shift toward “positive welfare.”
The Ministry of Labor has proposed several youth employment programs since 2014, with a budget of more than NT$30 billion. To utilize this massive budget effectively, the opinion of experts in social work should be reiterated, as the Cabinet can integrate the Investing in Youth Employment Program into its social welfare policies for coordinated implementation. This would resolve the problem of low wages and high unemployment of young people.
Chen Chien-hsien is an assistant professor in Meiho University’s Department of Social Work.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS