On Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced his party’s nomination of New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its candidate in next year’s presidential election.
The announcement immediately led to accusations that Hou was absconding from his job as mayor. The KMT promptly countered that Vice President William Lai (賴清德) was the real absconder.
However, Hou would do well to follow Lai’s example by immediately resigning as mayor so the Executive Yuan could appoint an acting mayor to prevent New Taipei City from being left rudderless, which could lead to attempts to recall Hou.
What does absconding really mean? Lai and Hou have acted very differently. Lai resigned as mayor of Tainan during his second and last term in office to serve as premier. He later stepped down as premier to run in the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential primary. Lai resigned both times, so no one could accuse him of trying to have his cake and eat it. In the case of the presidential primary, the Executive Yuan has plenty of resources, so would Lai not have stood a better chance of winning if he had remained as premier? Instead, he showed his sincerity by resigning.
Lai resigned as mayor of Tainan so that the Executive Yuan could assign an acting mayor, ensuring that the municipality would not be left in the lurch.
These examples clearly demonstrate Lai’s political philosophy and style.
In contrast, Hou and the KMT want to have their cake and eat it. The KMT does not dare let Hou resign because it is afraid of losing a mayoral by-election. That would be a repeat of happened to former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who won the KMT’s 2019 presidential primary while remaining in office.
As a resident of Kaohsiung, I witnessed how the Kaohsiung City Government was left at a standstill from when Han started to think about seeking the presidency to when he formally joined the race. No one in the administration dared to make big decisions and Kaohsiung residents suffered as a result. Who would have thought that Hou would do the same thing?
It is another matter when incumbent local councilors stand for election as mayors or county commissioners. All major parties, including the KMT, have followed this pattern over the years. It is a normal way of recruiting political talent, unlike when mayors, county commissioners or other administrative heads seek national office while remaining in their local posts.
To tackle the root of the problem and avoid a repeat of the Han saga, the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法) should be amended to prohibit mayors and county commissioners from standing for election while still in office and stipulating that if they do seek higher office, they would lose their current post on the day they register their candidacy.
However, until such an amendment is enacted, the fundamental solution should be for political parties to discipline themselves and not leave local governments hanging.
Democratic politics should give top priority to public welfare. If parties and politicians do not take this step, they will be accused of not caring about city and county residents, and of being unlikely to put the welfare of the public first as a national leader.
Michael Lin lives in Kaohsiung and holds a master’s degree from National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS