During US President Joe Biden’s May 13 address to Howard University, a historically black higher learning institution, he offered a forthright perspective on white supremacy.
“On the best days, enough of us have the guts and the hearts to stand up for the best in us. To choose love over hate, unity over disunion, progress over retreat. To stand up against the poison of white supremacy, as I did in my inaugural address — to single it out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland,” he said.
Biden is stating what has long been established as fact in the US, that extremist white supremacist groups are the foremost domestic terror threat. On this basis, his calling out and condemnation of white supremacy is welcome, authoritative and well-intended.
Illustration: Mountain People
The problem is that it does not do black people the favors he might think. Biden defined white supremacy in terms with which society is most comfortable: a phenomenon on extreme, unhinged, uncouth and often violent fringes.
That might be a form in which he sees it evident in the US. All countries are different, and manifestations vary, but here is the thing: Most black people who use the term define and view white supremacy quite differently.
To us, white supremacy is not just an armed white man with a swastika tattooed on his forehead. It is the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (called by then-US senator Biden, who drafted the legislation, “Biden’s bill”) juxtaposed with the Anti-drug Abuse Act of 1986 — which together led to the mass incarceration of, principally, black men.
It also explains the enormous sentencing disparity between powder cocaine and cheaper crack cocaine, which was more widely available in poorer and predominantly black communities. Under the 100-1 crack versus powder cocaine disparity that existed before 2010 (when it was reduced to 18-1), the distribution of just 5g of crack, versus 500g of powder cocaine, carried a minimum five-year federal prison sentence.
It also explains the difference in coverage, criminalizing and compassion between the “crack epidemic” and the “opioid crisis.”
White supremacy is not just a klansman burning a cross, it is that no one was held liable for the horrors inflicted on the people of Iraq. If the victims of the Iraq war were white, it is hard to believe that the architects of the assault would be on BBC Radio 4 opining on the issues of the day.
White supremacy is not just Combat 18 in combat gear. It is a homeless black man with mental health issues being choked to death on a subway train by a white marine veteran, members of a Fox News TV audience cheering at the report, and the attitude that sees the former soldier pre-emptively hailed a hero and bolstered with public donations of US$2 million toward his legal fees.
White supremacy is not just 14 words, it shapes what is seen as worthy history and what is dismissed as “wokery,” who is viewed as worthy of respect and empathy and who are dismissed as grifters with a “victimhood mentality.”
Although the main and intended beneficiaries of white supremacy are white people, perplexingly, when we speak of white supremacy, we are not exclusively speaking about the actions or ideologies of white people. Some of the foremost proponents of white supremacy are black and brown. For some it is so normalized that they struggle to understand a world without it. Others understand what happens to those who oppose white supremacy and are rightfully scared.
For some others it is a simple equation: If you cannot beat them, dine with them (and pray they do not dine on you).
British Home Secretary Suella Braverman said that “white people do not exist in a special state of sin or collective guilt ... the defining feature of this country’s relationship with slavery is not that we practiced it, but that we led the way in abolishing it.”
“The unexamined drive towards multiculturalism as an end in itself, combined with identity politics, is a recipe for communal disaster,” she added.
This sounds very much like the home secretary — as see-through as spring water — going to ludicrous extremes to appeal to the normalized nature of white supremacy in Britain, and in her own party?
So here is a memo to the president and all who see the world as he does. It is too easy to equate white supremacy with the outlier, the diseased mind plotting atrocities in a west Midlands kitchen, the gun and a former US president Donald Trump-loving, tobacco-chewing redneck who just cannot get the N-word out of his vocabulary. Because to many who look like me, white supremacy is not the fringe, it is central to much of what happens in society — to vast areas of legislation, to the economic hierarchy, to practices and perceptions.
Yes, we see the immediate urgency of the threat of white supremacy in extreme forms — as Biden does, but normalized white supremacy — in all its forms — is just as dangerous.
To much of society, “white supremacy” is merely a pejorative term, but to many of us it is reliable descriptor that helps us understand society. It is a knowledge that protects our family, our community, our sanity — our very selves.
Nels Abbey is a writer, broadcaster and former banker, and the author of Think Like a White Man.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS