During US President Joe Biden’s May 13 address to Howard University, a historically black higher learning institution, he offered a forthright perspective on white supremacy.
“On the best days, enough of us have the guts and the hearts to stand up for the best in us. To choose love over hate, unity over disunion, progress over retreat. To stand up against the poison of white supremacy, as I did in my inaugural address — to single it out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland,” he said.
Biden is stating what has long been established as fact in the US, that extremist white supremacist groups are the foremost domestic terror threat. On this basis, his calling out and condemnation of white supremacy is welcome, authoritative and well-intended.
Illustration: Mountain People
The problem is that it does not do black people the favors he might think. Biden defined white supremacy in terms with which society is most comfortable: a phenomenon on extreme, unhinged, uncouth and often violent fringes.
That might be a form in which he sees it evident in the US. All countries are different, and manifestations vary, but here is the thing: Most black people who use the term define and view white supremacy quite differently.
To us, white supremacy is not just an armed white man with a swastika tattooed on his forehead. It is the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (called by then-US senator Biden, who drafted the legislation, “Biden’s bill”) juxtaposed with the Anti-drug Abuse Act of 1986 — which together led to the mass incarceration of, principally, black men.
It also explains the enormous sentencing disparity between powder cocaine and cheaper crack cocaine, which was more widely available in poorer and predominantly black communities. Under the 100-1 crack versus powder cocaine disparity that existed before 2010 (when it was reduced to 18-1), the distribution of just 5g of crack, versus 500g of powder cocaine, carried a minimum five-year federal prison sentence.
It also explains the difference in coverage, criminalizing and compassion between the “crack epidemic” and the “opioid crisis.”
White supremacy is not just a klansman burning a cross, it is that no one was held liable for the horrors inflicted on the people of Iraq. If the victims of the Iraq war were white, it is hard to believe that the architects of the assault would be on BBC Radio 4 opining on the issues of the day.
White supremacy is not just Combat 18 in combat gear. It is a homeless black man with mental health issues being choked to death on a subway train by a white marine veteran, members of a Fox News TV audience cheering at the report, and the attitude that sees the former soldier pre-emptively hailed a hero and bolstered with public donations of US$2 million toward his legal fees.
White supremacy is not just 14 words, it shapes what is seen as worthy history and what is dismissed as “wokery,” who is viewed as worthy of respect and empathy and who are dismissed as grifters with a “victimhood mentality.”
Although the main and intended beneficiaries of white supremacy are white people, perplexingly, when we speak of white supremacy, we are not exclusively speaking about the actions or ideologies of white people. Some of the foremost proponents of white supremacy are black and brown. For some it is so normalized that they struggle to understand a world without it. Others understand what happens to those who oppose white supremacy and are rightfully scared.
For some others it is a simple equation: If you cannot beat them, dine with them (and pray they do not dine on you).
British Home Secretary Suella Braverman said that “white people do not exist in a special state of sin or collective guilt ... the defining feature of this country’s relationship with slavery is not that we practiced it, but that we led the way in abolishing it.”
“The unexamined drive towards multiculturalism as an end in itself, combined with identity politics, is a recipe for communal disaster,” she added.
This sounds very much like the home secretary — as see-through as spring water — going to ludicrous extremes to appeal to the normalized nature of white supremacy in Britain, and in her own party?
So here is a memo to the president and all who see the world as he does. It is too easy to equate white supremacy with the outlier, the diseased mind plotting atrocities in a west Midlands kitchen, the gun and a former US president Donald Trump-loving, tobacco-chewing redneck who just cannot get the N-word out of his vocabulary. Because to many who look like me, white supremacy is not the fringe, it is central to much of what happens in society — to vast areas of legislation, to the economic hierarchy, to practices and perceptions.
Yes, we see the immediate urgency of the threat of white supremacy in extreme forms — as Biden does, but normalized white supremacy — in all its forms — is just as dangerous.
To much of society, “white supremacy” is merely a pejorative term, but to many of us it is reliable descriptor that helps us understand society. It is a knowledge that protects our family, our community, our sanity — our very selves.
Nels Abbey is a writer, broadcaster and former banker, and the author of Think Like a White Man.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS