During US President Joe Biden’s May 13 address to Howard University, a historically black higher learning institution, he offered a forthright perspective on white supremacy.
“On the best days, enough of us have the guts and the hearts to stand up for the best in us. To choose love over hate, unity over disunion, progress over retreat. To stand up against the poison of white supremacy, as I did in my inaugural address — to single it out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland,” he said.
Biden is stating what has long been established as fact in the US, that extremist white supremacist groups are the foremost domestic terror threat. On this basis, his calling out and condemnation of white supremacy is welcome, authoritative and well-intended.
Illustration: Mountain People
The problem is that it does not do black people the favors he might think. Biden defined white supremacy in terms with which society is most comfortable: a phenomenon on extreme, unhinged, uncouth and often violent fringes.
That might be a form in which he sees it evident in the US. All countries are different, and manifestations vary, but here is the thing: Most black people who use the term define and view white supremacy quite differently.
To us, white supremacy is not just an armed white man with a swastika tattooed on his forehead. It is the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (called by then-US senator Biden, who drafted the legislation, “Biden’s bill”) juxtaposed with the Anti-drug Abuse Act of 1986 — which together led to the mass incarceration of, principally, black men.
It also explains the enormous sentencing disparity between powder cocaine and cheaper crack cocaine, which was more widely available in poorer and predominantly black communities. Under the 100-1 crack versus powder cocaine disparity that existed before 2010 (when it was reduced to 18-1), the distribution of just 5g of crack, versus 500g of powder cocaine, carried a minimum five-year federal prison sentence.
It also explains the difference in coverage, criminalizing and compassion between the “crack epidemic” and the “opioid crisis.”
White supremacy is not just a klansman burning a cross, it is that no one was held liable for the horrors inflicted on the people of Iraq. If the victims of the Iraq war were white, it is hard to believe that the architects of the assault would be on BBC Radio 4 opining on the issues of the day.
White supremacy is not just Combat 18 in combat gear. It is a homeless black man with mental health issues being choked to death on a subway train by a white marine veteran, members of a Fox News TV audience cheering at the report, and the attitude that sees the former soldier pre-emptively hailed a hero and bolstered with public donations of US$2 million toward his legal fees.
White supremacy is not just 14 words, it shapes what is seen as worthy history and what is dismissed as “wokery,” who is viewed as worthy of respect and empathy and who are dismissed as grifters with a “victimhood mentality.”
Although the main and intended beneficiaries of white supremacy are white people, perplexingly, when we speak of white supremacy, we are not exclusively speaking about the actions or ideologies of white people. Some of the foremost proponents of white supremacy are black and brown. For some it is so normalized that they struggle to understand a world without it. Others understand what happens to those who oppose white supremacy and are rightfully scared.
For some others it is a simple equation: If you cannot beat them, dine with them (and pray they do not dine on you).
British Home Secretary Suella Braverman said that “white people do not exist in a special state of sin or collective guilt ... the defining feature of this country’s relationship with slavery is not that we practiced it, but that we led the way in abolishing it.”
“The unexamined drive towards multiculturalism as an end in itself, combined with identity politics, is a recipe for communal disaster,” she added.
This sounds very much like the home secretary — as see-through as spring water — going to ludicrous extremes to appeal to the normalized nature of white supremacy in Britain, and in her own party?
So here is a memo to the president and all who see the world as he does. It is too easy to equate white supremacy with the outlier, the diseased mind plotting atrocities in a west Midlands kitchen, the gun and a former US president Donald Trump-loving, tobacco-chewing redneck who just cannot get the N-word out of his vocabulary. Because to many who look like me, white supremacy is not the fringe, it is central to much of what happens in society — to vast areas of legislation, to the economic hierarchy, to practices and perceptions.
Yes, we see the immediate urgency of the threat of white supremacy in extreme forms — as Biden does, but normalized white supremacy — in all its forms — is just as dangerous.
To much of society, “white supremacy” is merely a pejorative term, but to many of us it is reliable descriptor that helps us understand society. It is a knowledge that protects our family, our community, our sanity — our very selves.
Nels Abbey is a writer, broadcaster and former banker, and the author of Think Like a White Man.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS