Few countries confront a singular threat that consumes the sole focus of national defense as Taiwan does. Much of this has to do with a growing fear of China’s armed unification plan, whether it be a small-scale military operation to force Taiwan into negotiations or more belligerent options.
Meanwhile, China has strengthened autocratic rule guided by Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era to secure its smooth rise to global leadership. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) governing agenda prioritizes the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) leadership and discipline, national security concerns and a determination to bring Taiwan into its orbit.
Responding to new uncertainties in the regional balance of power, G7 leaders avoided presenting an anti-CCP united front at this year’s summit and expressed their wish to keep peace across the Taiwan Strait. The summit also included Australia, India, Brazil, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Comoros (representing the African Union) and the Cook Islands (representing the Pacific Islands Forum).
By connecting the G7 with the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and Pacific Islands Forum, the US maximizes freedom of policy options while enabling allied states to pursue bilateral ties with Taiwan. Such a public display of flexible cross-alliance unity not only displays Washington’s and Tokyo’s commitment to stabilizing the Taiwan Strait, but also makes it harder for Beijing to weaponize its economic leverage against allies.
In this hostile environment, incorporating Taiwan into its multilateral frameworks in the Indo-Pacific region is of great urgency for the US. Chinese political scientist Ye Xiaodi (?曉迪) wrote an article in Pacific Focus last year titled “Alliance Coordination: Explaining the Logic of Biden’s Taiwan Policy.”
Ye wrote that US President Joe Biden has convinced European and Pacific allies to concern themselves with Taiwan in response to China’s growing influence, and has advanced a policy of strategic clarity regarding Taiwan.
Recognizing Taiwan as a crucial non-NATO ally and a global technological powerhouse, Biden’s administration has introduced legislation to normalize arms sales and pursue free-trade agreements with it.
The speed of US alliance coordination seems to have constrained China’s strategy to achieve unification on two fronts.
First, the US has empowered allies to re-evaluate the “one China” principle. More foreign leaders and lawmakers are visiting Taiwan, undermining the decades-long perception of cross-strait relations and enabling allies to seek direct engagement with Taiwan.
Second, Taiwan’s pro-independence sentiment has generated a widespread global consensus, as evidenced by former British prime minister Liz Truss’ visit last week and then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit last year.
The more globalized the Taiwan issue is, the more support there will be for keeping it a liberal and democratic state. It would therefore be difficult for the CCP to galvanize Taiwan’s pro-unification sentiment for New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate in next year’s presidential election.
This year’s G7 has increased strategic resonance among allies, prompting them to associate their national interests with Taiwan’s security. While China is blaming the US for weaponizing the multilateral framework of alliance engagement, the dual internationalization of the Taiwan issue and Taiwan’s pro-independence movement is a political headache and forces Beijing to deal with multiple regional players at once.
Joseph Tse-hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the