Few would dispute that it is too expensive to purchase a house in Taiwan nowadays. In urban areas in particular, average housing prices are incredibly high.
Some blame construction companies and property developers for profiteering and artificially increasing housing prices. The truth is that there are many other factors, most notably a variety of extra expenses that make the cost of building much higher than estimated.
Administrative disruptions, political risks, time wasting and management costs all lead to much higher prices. A scarcity of land, shortage of construction workers and rising prices of raw materials have also kept housing prices high. Every house is built on a piece of land, and land prices always increase earlier and faster than housing prices.
Over the past two years, land prices and construction fees have increased dramatically. Taking these costs into account, construction companies have to increase the price of a house by 30 percent. Construction firms and property developers have to pay for their operating and sales fees, as well as taxes. Eventually, they are left with a net profit of about 10 percent.
If a project is scheduled to be completed within four years, the profit it can make is not necessarily huge. The government has been encouraged to implement more measures to bring down housing prices, and so construction firms and property developers have to take operational risks more seriously than before.
There are several ways to lower housing prices, but to intervene in construction companies’ business is not an effective method. Some say that regulating the companies would mitigate housing price hikes.
However, construction companies might collapse first if their net profit continues to decrease. The government should come up with a more realistic solution.
Most young people cannot afford to buy a house, which must be frustrating for them.
However, discouraging everyone from buying a house is unlikely to lower housing prices. If nobody wanted to buy a house, construction companies and property developers would stop undertaking new projects. With fewer houses available, prices would become even higher.
The only way to bring down housing prices is to increase supply. A brief suppression of consumer demand would lead to a rebound after only a short period.
Renovating old buildings is not common, hence these projects have not become an effective way to keep housing prices in check. The owners of old buildings wish to receive more in return. Also, due to the costs and limited amount of bulk reward, construction companies would increase the prices for their own sake. For them, construction costs and net profit should be proportional.
To address this, the margins for renovating old buildings must be increased, and more renovation projects arranged. The government should establish congenial relationships with construction companies and property developers. Some policies should be revised to facilitate reconstruction projects. Also, if workers’ incomes can be increased, they would be more interested in buying a house.
The government should consider this when stipulating measures.
William Hu is a property developer, and honorary chairman of the associations for the reconstruction and development of old buildings in New Taipei City.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS