During a talk with students at National Chengchi University, Vice President and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman William Lai (賴清德) asked if they had noticed that “housing prices are decreasing.” The majority of Taiwanese would find it difficult to agree with that idea.
Today, the average housing price in Taipei is so incredibly high that it would take at least 16 years for an office worker to buy an apartment, even if they spent nothing on food.
The government, under pressure from public opinion, has launched 11 waves of anti-speculation measures, yet housing prices remain stubbornly high.
When he was a DPP legislator, Lai proposed relocating the capital, calling on the government to move the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan from Taipei to central Taiwan to reduce pressure on the capital.
If Lai’s proposal was implemented, there might be a chance to solve the problem of high housing prices. It might also be a chance to plan reasonable locations for the Presidential Office Building, as well as ministries and other agencies, allowing Taiwan’s population and living areas to shift naturally, balancing development between the north and the south, and creating job opportunities while reducing the unemployment rate.
From the perspective of climate change, the relocation of the capital is something that really needs to be planned in advance.
There are precedents in the world where some countries have moved their capitals for different reasons.
During his presidential campaign, Lai should tell the public that relocating the capital is his vision for national development, using it as a policy to attract voters’ support.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022