The Disciplinary Court recently ordered that judge Chiang Li-hsiang (姜麗香) of the Shilin District Court be removed from office for covering up a sexual assault case in Taitung County, and that judge Hou Hung-wei (侯弘偉) of the Kaohsiung District Court be removed from office for leaking information about the case to the suspect, surnamed Lin (林).
The two judges are to be transferred from their posts and downgraded to “judicial associate officers” of the same court. They would become regular civil servants, so their annual salaries would be reduced by more than NT$1 million (US$32,522) and their retirement pensions are likely to shrink.
Judges are responsible for making judgements in court. In criminal cases, they are authorized to decide whether a defendant is guilty and on the severity of the penalty. In civil cases, they are authorized to decide whether a party wins or loses a lawsuit. As long as they do not break the law or commit major misconduct, they are protected by the spirit of “trial independence.”
Also, the salaries of judges are much higher than those of regular civil servants, in the hope that they can concentrate on making judgements honestly and justly, so that social justice can prevail.
As for judicial associate officers, their main duty is to assist judges during trials, but they are not authorized to make judgements by themselves.
In this case, the Disciplinary Court found that the two judges’ misconduct were so serious that they were no longer qualified for the job.
It is indeed rare for the court to directly downgrade judges to judicial associate officers.
However, to make the judiciary fit for purpose and ensure greater public trust, the court should have issued heavier punishments, so that it would not be criticized for “much said, but little done.”
The mere job transfers would not only fail to warn other unmindful or even ill-minded judges who are ready to cause trouble, but also exacerbate the problem, as the judiciary’s low reputation is likely to go from bad to worse.
Judges are paid a high salary, which is commensurate with the hard work they are expected to do. Since they are authorized to determine the rights and wrongs of legal cases, they should have a higher standard of accountability and ethics than regular civil servants, and they should be punished more severely in case of major misconduct.
By doing so, Taiwan can uphold the principle of fairness and justice, and save the judiciary’s poor image.
Tien Feng-wen
New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS