The Disciplinary Court recently ordered that judge Chiang Li-hsiang (姜麗香) of the Shilin District Court be removed from office for covering up a sexual assault case in Taitung County, and that judge Hou Hung-wei (侯弘偉) of the Kaohsiung District Court be removed from office for leaking information about the case to the suspect, surnamed Lin (林).
The two judges are to be transferred from their posts and downgraded to “judicial associate officers” of the same court. They would become regular civil servants, so their annual salaries would be reduced by more than NT$1 million (US$32,522) and their retirement pensions are likely to shrink.
Judges are responsible for making judgements in court. In criminal cases, they are authorized to decide whether a defendant is guilty and on the severity of the penalty. In civil cases, they are authorized to decide whether a party wins or loses a lawsuit. As long as they do not break the law or commit major misconduct, they are protected by the spirit of “trial independence.”
Also, the salaries of judges are much higher than those of regular civil servants, in the hope that they can concentrate on making judgements honestly and justly, so that social justice can prevail.
As for judicial associate officers, their main duty is to assist judges during trials, but they are not authorized to make judgements by themselves.
In this case, the Disciplinary Court found that the two judges’ misconduct were so serious that they were no longer qualified for the job.
It is indeed rare for the court to directly downgrade judges to judicial associate officers.
However, to make the judiciary fit for purpose and ensure greater public trust, the court should have issued heavier punishments, so that it would not be criticized for “much said, but little done.”
The mere job transfers would not only fail to warn other unmindful or even ill-minded judges who are ready to cause trouble, but also exacerbate the problem, as the judiciary’s low reputation is likely to go from bad to worse.
Judges are paid a high salary, which is commensurate with the hard work they are expected to do. Since they are authorized to determine the rights and wrongs of legal cases, they should have a higher standard of accountability and ethics than regular civil servants, and they should be punished more severely in case of major misconduct.
By doing so, Taiwan can uphold the principle of fairness and justice, and save the judiciary’s poor image.
Tien Feng-wen
New Taipei City
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS