After World War II, more than 130 states around the world achieved autonomy or independence from their colonial rulers, with the exception of Taiwan.
Under the authoritarian rule of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), Taiwan pulled out of the UN in 1971, refusing to hold a seat at the UN under the title “Republic of Taiwan.”
Afterward, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) went on to accelerate Taiwan’s democratic reform, while former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) proposed the “one country on each side” formula in 2002, strengthening democracy during his tenure.
With President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Taiwan has been undergoing an economic transformation. As the global community acknowledges Taiwan’s efforts and accomplishments, political leaders and delegations have started visiting Taiwan, unfazed by Chinese threats.
Tsai’s diplomatic progress with other nations and increasingly energetic efforts to elevate Taiwan’s status have won the recognition and support of Taiwanese.
A survey conducted by the Association of Chinese Elite Leadership said that 59.6 percent of respondents are happy with Tsai’s performance in safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty, 77.5 percent believed that the global community is more concerned about cross-strait issues, 60.5 percent thought that the international community has ratcheted up support for Taiwan and 57.1 percent believed that Taiwan has had a bigger influence on the global community.
Despite these efforts, that a democratic nation is still not recognized on the international stage as an independent and sovereign country is a source of pain and frustration for Taiwanese.
Ever since the pro-Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) regained the presidency seven years ago, Taiwan has made progress by leaps and bounds with its economy, technology and military. Given the changing political and geopolitical circumstances in the international order, Taiwan, as it strives to complete its normalization as a nation, must tackle long-term, pressing issues such as national sovereignty, national security, judicial reform, transitional justice, cultural education, social welfare, and environmental and economic development.
A pro-Taiwan coalition of civil elites and local non-governmental organizations recently launched a forum called the Civil Society Conference on National Affairs. By inviting local politicians to take part in discussions, the forum seeks to propose solutions and reforms to address the aforementioned issues and report to Taiwanese.
It is also calling on the candidates in next year’s presidential election to listen to people and introduce policy programs that are in accordance with the public’s needs in their campaigns.
As political parties in Taiwan have demonstrated explicit pro-US or pro-China stances, Taiwanese, when casting their ballots for their favored candidate, would be either siding with the democratic or the autocratic camp, which could lead to peace or war in due course.
For Taiwan, it could also mean holding on to a democratic, free society, or becoming a second Hong Kong under the oppressive thumb of China.
Taiwan’s fate should be decided by Taiwanese, and its democracy and freedom are the unwavering consensus and the most cherished values of every resident living in the nation. Taiwanese should once again come together to display their ironclad commitment to freedom and democracy in opposition to China’s autocracy in next year’s election.
Chang Yeh-shen is the founder of the Civil Society Conference on National Affairs and a former chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Rita Wang
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS