Taiwan’s economy has benefited from its advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and the return of Taiwanese businesses, the Department of Statistics said in a report on April 28. The factors have contributed to Taiwan’s average annual GDP growth of 3.2 percent over the past decade, better than South Korea’s 2.6 percent over the period.
Furthermore, with the recent depreciation of the South Korean won, Taiwan’s GDP per capita of US$32,811 last year once again surpassed that of South Korea, which was US$32,237.
FOREX RATES
GDP per capita is calculated by dividing a country’s GDP by its population. If population is assumed to remain unchanged, the most important factors affecting GDP per capita are foreign exchange rates and GDP growth.
The foreign exchange rate is indeed a key factor in Taiwan’s GDP per capita surpassing that of South Korea.
South Korea, which is economically and industrially similar to Taiwan, used to be a stronger economic power, but has declined significantly in the past few years. On the other hand, the accelerated repatriation of Taiwanese businesses amid US-China tensions and the effect of semiconductor transfer orders have become catalysts for Taiwan’s economic recovery.
INNOVATION
Also contributing to the dynamics that fuels Taiwan’s economic growth are the promotion of industry transformation, innovation and global distribution — especially through value creation and digital transformation — and the continuous improvement of core technologies and gross margins, which has laid a solid foundation for the industry.
Taiwan’s GDP performance is quite impressive, which is indeed worthy of recognition.
However, the nation still has to look beyond the seemingly satisfying statistics, and face up to the hidden problems and figure out the ways to tackle them.
First, Taiwan’s GDP relies too much on technological industries such as semiconductors, information and communication, which can easily lead to the hollowing out of other industries. The latter could in turn suffer from low demand, excessive inventory, inflation, interest rate hikes or other economic effects.
To reduce risks and improve overall output value, the nation must also pay attention to the development of domestic demand industries, such as traditional industries and the service sector, as well as education, tourism, culture and arts, and make good use of digital transformation.
The government should also legislate more complete laws and policies to facilitate such development.
Second, the increase in GDP per capita might be coming from wealthy people, who account for only a fraction of the population, while the wages of the majority are still low. The widening gap between the rich and poor, and the worsening relative deprivation might lead to social problems.
Moreover, people have been experiencing slow wage growth and fast price hikes, and deem GDP growth an “insensitive” figure that cannot truly reflect the difficulties they have to face in real life, such as income inequality, low wages, inflation, rising housing prices and rents, high loan payments, having to work multiple jobs and doing overtime, as well as unemployment, increasing poverty, labor shortages, brain drain and a lower quality of life.
INCOMPLETE MEASURE
Simon Kuznets, a Nobel laureate in economics and an honorary academician at Academia Sinica, has said that GDP reflects objective economic data, but it cannot measure people’s happiness or joy.
The government should not focus only on GDP figures, but also listen to people and see the real problems behind the numbers.
It should strive to solve economic inequality, stabilize prices, encourage companies to raise wages, balance the development of industries and create people-friendly environments, so that Taiwanese can enjoy a good and prosperous life in a sustainable country.
Su Wei-cheng is a lecturer and a former secretary of the president of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS