Recently, the issue of high housing prices has again been hotly debated. Some say that prices should be further regulated, whereas some believe that it is unnecessary.
Housing prices have been brought down to a moderate level, thanks to the central bank raising interest rates for new mortgages. Financial agencies have also tightened credit controls. Today, those who can purchase a house or invest in real estate have to put up more money themselves.
Moreover, the Equalization of Land Rights Act (平均地權條例) has been amended to regulate the sale of pre-sale houses. All these measures have contributed to mitigating housing price hikes. This is a fact that should not be distorted by politics.
As demonstrated by housing market statistics, especially stock prices and surpluses, listed construction companies do not make as much money as before.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated island. If the majority of people only consider Taipei, New Taipei City and some prime areas in southern Taiwan as their choice of housing locations, housing prices will remain as high as they are now. The ongoing accumulation of wealth and inflation would make the prices even higher.
People should recognize the housing price hikes as a result rather than a cause. The only way to solve the problem is to cope with the uneven development in Taiwan and the gap between urban and rural areas. In areas where the housing prices are much lower, the government should fix a variety of issues first, so that people would want to consider buying a house there. Officials must work on increasing career opportunities, improving medical care and living conditions, as well as enhancing the quality of education in rural areas. That way, the concentration of people in only a few cities can be changed.
Consider the three presidential candidates’ viewpoints on this issue. Vice President William Lai (賴清德) proposed “decompression of the capital city” when he was premier. Taiwan People’s Party founder and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has said that “the countryside should remain as it is.” New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), despite his experience as a landlord, has not proposed a thing.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS