Recently, the issue of high housing prices has again been hotly debated. Some say that prices should be further regulated, whereas some believe that it is unnecessary.
Housing prices have been brought down to a moderate level, thanks to the central bank raising interest rates for new mortgages. Financial agencies have also tightened credit controls. Today, those who can purchase a house or invest in real estate have to put up more money themselves.
Moreover, the Equalization of Land Rights Act (平均地權條例) has been amended to regulate the sale of pre-sale houses. All these measures have contributed to mitigating housing price hikes. This is a fact that should not be distorted by politics.
As demonstrated by housing market statistics, especially stock prices and surpluses, listed construction companies do not make as much money as before.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated island. If the majority of people only consider Taipei, New Taipei City and some prime areas in southern Taiwan as their choice of housing locations, housing prices will remain as high as they are now. The ongoing accumulation of wealth and inflation would make the prices even higher.
People should recognize the housing price hikes as a result rather than a cause. The only way to solve the problem is to cope with the uneven development in Taiwan and the gap between urban and rural areas. In areas where the housing prices are much lower, the government should fix a variety of issues first, so that people would want to consider buying a house there. Officials must work on increasing career opportunities, improving medical care and living conditions, as well as enhancing the quality of education in rural areas. That way, the concentration of people in only a few cities can be changed.
Consider the three presidential candidates’ viewpoints on this issue. Vice President William Lai (賴清德) proposed “decompression of the capital city” when he was premier. Taiwan People’s Party founder and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has said that “the countryside should remain as it is.” New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), despite his experience as a landlord, has not proposed a thing.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Emma Liu
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS