Recently, the issue of high housing prices has again been hotly debated. Some say that prices should be further regulated, whereas some believe that it is unnecessary.
Housing prices have been brought down to a moderate level, thanks to the central bank raising interest rates for new mortgages. Financial agencies have also tightened credit controls. Today, those who can purchase a house or invest in real estate have to put up more money themselves.
Moreover, the Equalization of Land Rights Act (平均地權條例) has been amended to regulate the sale of pre-sale houses. All these measures have contributed to mitigating housing price hikes. This is a fact that should not be distorted by politics.
As demonstrated by housing market statistics, especially stock prices and surpluses, listed construction companies do not make as much money as before.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated island. If the majority of people only consider Taipei, New Taipei City and some prime areas in southern Taiwan as their choice of housing locations, housing prices will remain as high as they are now. The ongoing accumulation of wealth and inflation would make the prices even higher.
People should recognize the housing price hikes as a result rather than a cause. The only way to solve the problem is to cope with the uneven development in Taiwan and the gap between urban and rural areas. In areas where the housing prices are much lower, the government should fix a variety of issues first, so that people would want to consider buying a house there. Officials must work on increasing career opportunities, improving medical care and living conditions, as well as enhancing the quality of education in rural areas. That way, the concentration of people in only a few cities can be changed.
Consider the three presidential candidates’ viewpoints on this issue. Vice President William Lai (賴清德) proposed “decompression of the capital city” when he was premier. Taiwan People’s Party founder and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has said that “the countryside should remain as it is.” New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), despite his experience as a landlord, has not proposed a thing.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS