To strengthen US deterrence against North Korean threats, Washington said that an Ohio-class nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarine would visit South Korea in accordance with the Washington Declaration, a joint agreement issued by US President Joe Biden and by South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol during the latter’s six-day state visit to the US.
This has everything to do with security in the Taiwan Strait. Washington has worked to win Seoul over. The US has been providing assistance and aid to improve South Korea’s military, and one of the reasons for doing so is to deter the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Since the end of World War II, the US has concerned itself with the Northeast Asian region. When the Korean War broke out in June 1950, US forces in Japan significantly contributed as part of the UN armed forces.
Since then, US troops have stayed in the Korean Peninsula. The US military presence in the region has affected not only the growth of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces in the south, but also the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s nuclear development in the north.
In recent years, particularly since former US president Barack Obama’s administration, the US has strategically rearranged its forces according to its pivot to Asia policy.
In the face of tensions between South Korea and North Korea, Washington has increased its military deployment in the Korean Peninsula to counter the CCP.
US-South Korea joint military drills are held on a regular basis. The collaboration between the two countries is no longer purely militarily, as it used to be in the post-Cold War era.
Instead, the US has taken advantage of its relations with South Korea to advance US interests in Northeast Asia. Relations between the two Koreas have been under the influence of Washington as well.
A closer look at the Korean Peninsula reveals the US’ strategic arrangement.
First, if the conflict in the Korean Peninsula intensifies, the US’ presence there would allow it to gain more leverage from the six-party talks (China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea and the US).
Second, the US is sending clear signals to its rivals in Northeast Asia: the CCP and Russia.
Third, the US is trying to exchange benefits with North Korea to curb China, with an aim to obtain a military advantage.
Fourth, through mechanisms derived from joint military drills in the region, the US can sell more weapons to two of its important allies, Japan and South Korea.
Fifth, the US intends to limit the development of nuclear weapons in Northeast Asia to anti-ballistic missiles. The purpose is to maintain its strategic advantage on the Northeast Asian frontlines, and at the same time contain the CCP’s military expansion outward.
Sixth, the US has been preparing to deploy its second fleet in a South Korean naval base, to keep an eye on the CCP’s fleet and prevent it from navigating across the Pacific Ocean.
After the Cold War ended in 1990, the strategic plans of the US have worked in tandem with its pivot toward Asia, which has been applied to the Northeast Asian region to contain the CCP.
Meanwhile, Washington has exploited historical problems and unresolved business between East Asian countries, bringing them closer to the US.
The US armed forces all over the world, particularly in Europe and Asia, have been arranged by Washington to hold joint military drills. Such collaborations have significantly contributed to US interests, allowing it to obtain more leverage and consolidate its influence over its allies.
Unfortunately, Taiwan cannot be part of the talks on North Korea’s nuclear issue. However, Taiwan must make its anti-nuclear stance loud and clear in all possible international occasions, demonstrating and emphasizing its principle of fighting for peace.
In the meantime, Taiwan should observe the US’ nuclear deployment and strategic arrangement in Northeast Asia. Taiwan can become a key player among the world’s multiple superpowers competing in Northeast Asia.
Chang Yan-ting is a retired air force lieutenant general and an honorary emeritus professor at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS