To strengthen US deterrence against North Korean threats, Washington said that an Ohio-class nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarine would visit South Korea in accordance with the Washington Declaration, a joint agreement issued by US President Joe Biden and by South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol during the latter’s six-day state visit to the US.
This has everything to do with security in the Taiwan Strait. Washington has worked to win Seoul over. The US has been providing assistance and aid to improve South Korea’s military, and one of the reasons for doing so is to deter the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Since the end of World War II, the US has concerned itself with the Northeast Asian region. When the Korean War broke out in June 1950, US forces in Japan significantly contributed as part of the UN armed forces.
Since then, US troops have stayed in the Korean Peninsula. The US military presence in the region has affected not only the growth of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces in the south, but also the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s nuclear development in the north.
In recent years, particularly since former US president Barack Obama’s administration, the US has strategically rearranged its forces according to its pivot to Asia policy.
In the face of tensions between South Korea and North Korea, Washington has increased its military deployment in the Korean Peninsula to counter the CCP.
US-South Korea joint military drills are held on a regular basis. The collaboration between the two countries is no longer purely militarily, as it used to be in the post-Cold War era.
Instead, the US has taken advantage of its relations with South Korea to advance US interests in Northeast Asia. Relations between the two Koreas have been under the influence of Washington as well.
A closer look at the Korean Peninsula reveals the US’ strategic arrangement.
First, if the conflict in the Korean Peninsula intensifies, the US’ presence there would allow it to gain more leverage from the six-party talks (China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea and the US).
Second, the US is sending clear signals to its rivals in Northeast Asia: the CCP and Russia.
Third, the US is trying to exchange benefits with North Korea to curb China, with an aim to obtain a military advantage.
Fourth, through mechanisms derived from joint military drills in the region, the US can sell more weapons to two of its important allies, Japan and South Korea.
Fifth, the US intends to limit the development of nuclear weapons in Northeast Asia to anti-ballistic missiles. The purpose is to maintain its strategic advantage on the Northeast Asian frontlines, and at the same time contain the CCP’s military expansion outward.
Sixth, the US has been preparing to deploy its second fleet in a South Korean naval base, to keep an eye on the CCP’s fleet and prevent it from navigating across the Pacific Ocean.
After the Cold War ended in 1990, the strategic plans of the US have worked in tandem with its pivot toward Asia, which has been applied to the Northeast Asian region to contain the CCP.
Meanwhile, Washington has exploited historical problems and unresolved business between East Asian countries, bringing them closer to the US.
The US armed forces all over the world, particularly in Europe and Asia, have been arranged by Washington to hold joint military drills. Such collaborations have significantly contributed to US interests, allowing it to obtain more leverage and consolidate its influence over its allies.
Unfortunately, Taiwan cannot be part of the talks on North Korea’s nuclear issue. However, Taiwan must make its anti-nuclear stance loud and clear in all possible international occasions, demonstrating and emphasizing its principle of fighting for peace.
In the meantime, Taiwan should observe the US’ nuclear deployment and strategic arrangement in Northeast Asia. Taiwan can become a key player among the world’s multiple superpowers competing in Northeast Asia.
Chang Yan-ting is a retired air force lieutenant general and an honorary emeritus professor at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) on Monday rebuked seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for stalling a special defense budget and visiting China. The legislators — including Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) and Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) — attended an event in Xiamen, China, over the weekend hosted by the Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association, where they met officials from Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). “Weng’s decision to stall the special defense budget defies majority public opinion,” Wu said, accusing KMT legislators of acting as proxies for Beijing. KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), acting head of the party’s Culture and Communications