Alert to cognitive warfare
Some of the people who had bought the book If China Invades (阿共打來怎麼辦) from Eslite Bookstore’s online store have reported receiving mysterious telephone calls from Chinese claiming to be pollsters conducting a survey on “sensitive reading material.”
The callers reportedly spouted “united front” rhetoric throughout the conversation, such as “the book has inappropriate content,” “the Chinese military’s capabilities are strong, so there is no way Taiwan can win the war,” “the US will not help,” “Taiwanese soldiers are afraid to fight,” “the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] is better” and “unification with Taiwan is inevitable.”
The Taiwan Statebuilding Party accused Eslite of being responsible for the alleged leak of its customers’ private data and called on the government to take more concrete steps in countering China’s all-out cognitive warfare.
Eslite should conduct a thorough review, bolster its data and information security, and carry out remedial measures, such as compensating buyers whose data were leaked, as well as submit a report to the Ministry of Digital Affairs.
The ministry should mete out penalties if Eslite is found to have contravened regulations. It would serve as a warning that if other private or public institutions or corporations make the same mistakes, they would be given harsh penalties.
China’s cognitive warfare has gone from the underground to the public sphere, from collective warfare to individual, one-on-one infiltration. Beijing would only step up its attacks, and if the public does not have enough resolve or awareness, it risks being brainwashed and influenced by the Chinese Communist Party’s relentless propaganda. To push back against the dirty tricks of China’s cognitive warfare, the government should educate the public on how to identify, deal with and think about infiltration.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS