Alert to cognitive warfare
Some of the people who had bought the book If China Invades (阿共打來怎麼辦) from Eslite Bookstore’s online store have reported receiving mysterious telephone calls from Chinese claiming to be pollsters conducting a survey on “sensitive reading material.”
The callers reportedly spouted “united front” rhetoric throughout the conversation, such as “the book has inappropriate content,” “the Chinese military’s capabilities are strong, so there is no way Taiwan can win the war,” “the US will not help,” “Taiwanese soldiers are afraid to fight,” “the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] is better” and “unification with Taiwan is inevitable.”
The Taiwan Statebuilding Party accused Eslite of being responsible for the alleged leak of its customers’ private data and called on the government to take more concrete steps in countering China’s all-out cognitive warfare.
Eslite should conduct a thorough review, bolster its data and information security, and carry out remedial measures, such as compensating buyers whose data were leaked, as well as submit a report to the Ministry of Digital Affairs.
The ministry should mete out penalties if Eslite is found to have contravened regulations. It would serve as a warning that if other private or public institutions or corporations make the same mistakes, they would be given harsh penalties.
China’s cognitive warfare has gone from the underground to the public sphere, from collective warfare to individual, one-on-one infiltration. Beijing would only step up its attacks, and if the public does not have enough resolve or awareness, it risks being brainwashed and influenced by the Chinese Communist Party’s relentless propaganda. To push back against the dirty tricks of China’s cognitive warfare, the government should educate the public on how to identify, deal with and think about infiltration.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS