Alert to cognitive warfare
Some of the people who had bought the book If China Invades (阿共打來怎麼辦) from Eslite Bookstore’s online store have reported receiving mysterious telephone calls from Chinese claiming to be pollsters conducting a survey on “sensitive reading material.”
The callers reportedly spouted “united front” rhetoric throughout the conversation, such as “the book has inappropriate content,” “the Chinese military’s capabilities are strong, so there is no way Taiwan can win the war,” “the US will not help,” “Taiwanese soldiers are afraid to fight,” “the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] is better” and “unification with Taiwan is inevitable.”
The Taiwan Statebuilding Party accused Eslite of being responsible for the alleged leak of its customers’ private data and called on the government to take more concrete steps in countering China’s all-out cognitive warfare.
Eslite should conduct a thorough review, bolster its data and information security, and carry out remedial measures, such as compensating buyers whose data were leaked, as well as submit a report to the Ministry of Digital Affairs.
The ministry should mete out penalties if Eslite is found to have contravened regulations. It would serve as a warning that if other private or public institutions or corporations make the same mistakes, they would be given harsh penalties.
China’s cognitive warfare has gone from the underground to the public sphere, from collective warfare to individual, one-on-one infiltration. Beijing would only step up its attacks, and if the public does not have enough resolve or awareness, it risks being brainwashed and influenced by the Chinese Communist Party’s relentless propaganda. To push back against the dirty tricks of China’s cognitive warfare, the government should educate the public on how to identify, deal with and think about infiltration.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS