Seeing former British prime minister Liz Truss visit Taiwan, pro-China politicians unfamiliar with British politics have lashed out by calling her a “washed-up political figure” who is seeking to make political capital out of the visit. With British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak backtracking on a pledge to shut down 30 Chinese state-sponsored Confucius Institutes across the UK, these politicians capitalized on the opportunity to disparage the significance of her visit to Taiwan.
However, anyone familiar with British politics would know that Truss is anything but a “washed up second-rate” politician. Chinese officials should not be so quick to write her off, as there remains the possibility that she could return as foreign secretary or assume another prominent government office.
When former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher visited Taiwan in 1992, she was no longer a member of the House of Commons who exercised real power, but a peer in the House of Lords, which is essentially a retirement position. However, as Truss is still a sitting member of the House of Commons, she has every opportunity of re-entering the Cabinet, especially as one of the four Great Offices of State: prime minister, chancellor of the exchequer, home secretary and foreign secretary.
Therefore, Truss’ visit is significant because it marks the first time a former British prime minister who is still an MP has set foot in Taiwan. As long as she remains an MP and the UK needs her, the chances of her being appointed to a major office are still on the table, as in the case of former British prime minister Winston Churchill, who served twice as prime minister.
So far, Sunak ally British Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office’s pro-China policy are not winning favor with the British public. The hawkish wing of the governing Conservative Party has established the China Research Group, an influential political organization modeled after the European Research Group that pushed for a no-nonsense, hard Brexit. Following the Conservative Party’s heavy losses in the local elections early this month, Sunak could be pressured into stepping down or ousted by his backbenchers in due course.
While Truss is visiting Taiwan as the G7 summit goes on in Hiroshima, Japan, her predecessor, Boris Johnson, flew to South Korea. The two displayed the Conservative Party’s hardline policy on China, and called on G7 leaders to take a tougher stance toward Beijing as it seeks to challenge the US-led global order.
Consequently, Truss’ argument during her visit in Taiwan could one day turn into policy.
“They [China] have already formed alliances with other nations that want to see the free world in decline. They have already made a choice about their strategy. The only choice we have is whether we appease and accommodate — or we take action to prevent conflict,” Truss said.
On the other side of the world, a 10-strong bipartisan delegation led by US Representative Mike Gallagher, chairman of the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the US and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is to spend three days in the UK meeting British ministers, officials and backbenchers to discuss a common approach to hostile activities by the CCP.
In view of these other events, Truss’ visit to Taiwan is not only an open display of support for Taiwan, but also a wake-up call for businesspeople, China Hands and politicians who still harbor fantasies about China. Anyone who deemed Truss an “out-of-touch politician” is out of touch with British politics.
Martin Oei is a Hong Kong-born British political commentator based in Germany and a member of the British Conservative Party.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
RSS