On Wednesday last week, a regrettable incident happened on the Taichung MRT Green Line, causing one death. The woman who died was Providence University Department of Law instructor Lin Shu-ya (林淑雅), who had devoted herself to social movements, including the campaign to abolish the death penalty.
Her grieving mother said that she wished she could have died instead of her daughter, making headlines in some media in the run-up to Mother’s Day on Sunday.
However, because Lin had supported the abolition of the death penalty, her mother’s statement, with its implication of “a life for a life,” was over-emphasized, with some opponents of abolishing the death penalty making a big deal of it on social media.
Some news Web sites had a lot of comments along these lines, as if Lin were a villain who had caused the deaths of many others, rather than a campaigner devoted to human rights protections.
The television drama series Copycat Killer (模仿犯) has introduced many Taiwanese unfamiliar with mystery novels to the name Miyuki Miyabe — the author of the novel on which the series is based.
My favorite books by Miyabe are the Saburo Sugimura series, later made into a Japanese TV drama with Kotaro Koizumi playing the role of Sugimura, the main character.
The second novel in the series, Nameless Poison, refers to a poison that is hard to identify. This kind of poison comes from people, and some are more toxic than others.
In the novels, Sugimura believes that humans used to be afraid of wild beasts, but after trapping wild beasts and naming them, humans changed their formless fear into a visible one that was easier to cope with.
However, poison that comes from people remains nameless, which makes it harder to handle.
Those who oppose the abolition of the death penalty and posted comments mocking Lin brought to mind this nameless poison. Is it a collective malice?
What is it that can suddenly turn ordinary white-collar workers, neighbors and loving parents into vicious, illogical, poisonous snakes that bite anything that moves?
Some people believe it is online anonymity, while others say it is social polarization. Either way, they are only partly right.
The poison that Miyabe wrote about existed long before the Internet and online groups. It lies hidden in the human heart, always looking for a chance to spew out.
When you join a group on social media or a messaging platform, it is hard to avoid coming across a few of these toxic people.
The only way to avoid getting poisoned is to block them on the platform or avoid them. Considering their toxicity, avoid engaging with them. Any attempt at rational communication would only provoke them. There are better things to do.
We must remember that we are all toxic, and we should try to leave the poison in our hearts and not pour it out on social media.
Unfortunately, there are some people out there who cannot resist trying to poison others. Keep clear of such people.
Chang Yueh-han holds a doctorate in journalism and communications from Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS