Two petitions recently posted on the Public Policy Online Participation Network Platform calling for a four-day workweek and reduced working hours have passed the signature threshold, requiring the government to respond.
One of the petitions asked that the government make Taiwan the first country in Asia to implement a three-day weekend, while the other appealed to revise Article 30 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) to lower the number of daily working hours to six or seven, or 30 to 35 hours per week.
According to the petition, although Taiwan’s average annual working hours dropped to 2,000 in 2021, the lowest in history, it was still the fourth-highest in the world. The petitioner hopes an extra day off could improve productivity, reduce employee turnover, and allow people to spend more time with family and friends.
Taiwan has already come a long way regarding its work revolution. In 1998, the government introduced a policy of a five-day workweek per fortnight, in the hopes that private firms would reduce working hours. This paved the way for the introduction of 84 work hours per fortnight, and finally a five-day workweek policy in 2001. With the implementation of the five-day workweek, the government canceled seven national holidays, such as Teacher’s Day.
A four-day workweek policy could cause other issues. Although the three-day weekend trend seems to be popular in places such as the US, the Netherlands and Japan, it is still in experimental and trial phases, and has only been adopted by some companies, rather than an all-out policy. Without any country fully adopting the policy, Taiwan should take baby steps when considering its implementation.
The policy might not suit all industries. As the economy is largely export-oriented and manufacturing focused, many sectors require a presence seven days per week, high productivity and a large labor force — such as public transportation, healthcare and public services. Fewer working hours could be impractical or unfavorable to these industries, and it could affect public services and some workers, such as contract workers, could end up with salary cuts. For other sectors, the policy would force employees to work overtime on their workdays to maintain the same workload, which would go against the spirit of the petition.
The policy would not be popular for small and medium-sized enterprises. With regulations governing workers’ days off, and capital paying for workers’ labor insurance and pension, a four-day workweek policy would become a huge burden to these enterprises, which could lead to layoffs. Companies in these areas might have to pay more in overtime fees, or have to draft staff to make up shortfalls.
As with the implementation of the five-day workweek, a four-day workweek would be at the expense of national holidays. For the education sector, that would mean the elimination of summer or winter breaks.
As Taiwanese start to fight for a work-life balance, perhaps the Ministry of Labor could start by amending the Labor Act and first cut down the number of working hours, or increase the number of national holidays with other measures. Instead of pie-in-the-sky labor policies, it would be better for the government to adopt a modest approach.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS