Two petitions recently posted on the Public Policy Online Participation Network Platform calling for a four-day workweek and reduced working hours have passed the signature threshold, requiring the government to respond.
One of the petitions asked that the government make Taiwan the first country in Asia to implement a three-day weekend, while the other appealed to revise Article 30 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) to lower the number of daily working hours to six or seven, or 30 to 35 hours per week.
According to the petition, although Taiwan’s average annual working hours dropped to 2,000 in 2021, the lowest in history, it was still the fourth-highest in the world. The petitioner hopes an extra day off could improve productivity, reduce employee turnover, and allow people to spend more time with family and friends.
Taiwan has already come a long way regarding its work revolution. In 1998, the government introduced a policy of a five-day workweek per fortnight, in the hopes that private firms would reduce working hours. This paved the way for the introduction of 84 work hours per fortnight, and finally a five-day workweek policy in 2001. With the implementation of the five-day workweek, the government canceled seven national holidays, such as Teacher’s Day.
A four-day workweek policy could cause other issues. Although the three-day weekend trend seems to be popular in places such as the US, the Netherlands and Japan, it is still in experimental and trial phases, and has only been adopted by some companies, rather than an all-out policy. Without any country fully adopting the policy, Taiwan should take baby steps when considering its implementation.
The policy might not suit all industries. As the economy is largely export-oriented and manufacturing focused, many sectors require a presence seven days per week, high productivity and a large labor force — such as public transportation, healthcare and public services. Fewer working hours could be impractical or unfavorable to these industries, and it could affect public services and some workers, such as contract workers, could end up with salary cuts. For other sectors, the policy would force employees to work overtime on their workdays to maintain the same workload, which would go against the spirit of the petition.
The policy would not be popular for small and medium-sized enterprises. With regulations governing workers’ days off, and capital paying for workers’ labor insurance and pension, a four-day workweek policy would become a huge burden to these enterprises, which could lead to layoffs. Companies in these areas might have to pay more in overtime fees, or have to draft staff to make up shortfalls.
As with the implementation of the five-day workweek, a four-day workweek would be at the expense of national holidays. For the education sector, that would mean the elimination of summer or winter breaks.
As Taiwanese start to fight for a work-life balance, perhaps the Ministry of Labor could start by amending the Labor Act and first cut down the number of working hours, or increase the number of national holidays with other measures. Instead of pie-in-the-sky labor policies, it would be better for the government to adopt a modest approach.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS