Two petitions recently posted on the Public Policy Online Participation Network Platform calling for a four-day workweek and reduced working hours have passed the signature threshold, requiring the government to respond.
One of the petitions asked that the government make Taiwan the first country in Asia to implement a three-day weekend, while the other appealed to revise Article 30 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) to lower the number of daily working hours to six or seven, or 30 to 35 hours per week.
According to the petition, although Taiwan’s average annual working hours dropped to 2,000 in 2021, the lowest in history, it was still the fourth-highest in the world. The petitioner hopes an extra day off could improve productivity, reduce employee turnover, and allow people to spend more time with family and friends.
Taiwan has already come a long way regarding its work revolution. In 1998, the government introduced a policy of a five-day workweek per fortnight, in the hopes that private firms would reduce working hours. This paved the way for the introduction of 84 work hours per fortnight, and finally a five-day workweek policy in 2001. With the implementation of the five-day workweek, the government canceled seven national holidays, such as Teacher’s Day.
A four-day workweek policy could cause other issues. Although the three-day weekend trend seems to be popular in places such as the US, the Netherlands and Japan, it is still in experimental and trial phases, and has only been adopted by some companies, rather than an all-out policy. Without any country fully adopting the policy, Taiwan should take baby steps when considering its implementation.
The policy might not suit all industries. As the economy is largely export-oriented and manufacturing focused, many sectors require a presence seven days per week, high productivity and a large labor force — such as public transportation, healthcare and public services. Fewer working hours could be impractical or unfavorable to these industries, and it could affect public services and some workers, such as contract workers, could end up with salary cuts. For other sectors, the policy would force employees to work overtime on their workdays to maintain the same workload, which would go against the spirit of the petition.
The policy would not be popular for small and medium-sized enterprises. With regulations governing workers’ days off, and capital paying for workers’ labor insurance and pension, a four-day workweek policy would become a huge burden to these enterprises, which could lead to layoffs. Companies in these areas might have to pay more in overtime fees, or have to draft staff to make up shortfalls.
As with the implementation of the five-day workweek, a four-day workweek would be at the expense of national holidays. For the education sector, that would mean the elimination of summer or winter breaks.
As Taiwanese start to fight for a work-life balance, perhaps the Ministry of Labor could start by amending the Labor Act and first cut down the number of working hours, or increase the number of national holidays with other measures. Instead of pie-in-the-sky labor policies, it would be better for the government to adopt a modest approach.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS