A woman who purchased books from Eslite bookstore was harassed by telephone calls from someone claiming to an Eslite marketing employee, saying that “there is no way Taiwan could win a war with China” and “unification with Taiwan is inevitable,” among other things.
The case not only involved the leak of personal data, but revealed the extent of the infiltration of China’s cognitive warfare that Taiwanese have to reckon with.
Here I Stand Project deputy secretary-general Cynthia Yang (楊欣慈), who bought the anti-Chinese Communist Party book If China Attacks (阿共打來怎麼辦) from Eslite’s online bookstore in February, said at a news conference that she received a telephone call on Saturday from a woman claiming to work at Eslite’s marketing department, warning her that some of the content of the book was “inappropriate” and inviting Yang to participate in a survey being conducted by the store.
Yang then received another call from a man, who also identified himself as an Eslite pollster, despite not knowing that Taichung is a city in Taiwan.
He told Yang that “the Chinese military’s capabilities are strong, so there is no way Taiwan can win a war,” that “the US will not help” and that “Taiwanese soldiers are afraid to fight,” as well as promoting ideas such as “the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is better,” “we are all Chinese, not Taiwanese,” and “unification with Taiwan is inevitable.”
Leaks of personal data in Taiwan is nothing new, be it from private firms or government agencies.
Taiwan has been named the No. 1 target of cyberattacks in the world — it is estimated that there are between 20 million and 40 million cyberattacks originating in China every month.
The Eslite case is obviously not financial fraud, but it shows that personal information leaked by Taiwanese companies has been used to launch cognitive warfare against Taiwanese on behalf of China’s propaganda machine.
It is outrageous, but not surprising that people who buy or read certain politically sensitive books are being monitored, especially when online platforms have branches in China or Chinese partners.
Well-known cases, such as Hong Kong bookseller Lam Wing-kei (林榮基) being prosecuted by Chinese authorities and Taiwan-based publisher Li Yanhe (李延賀) being detained by Chinese police, have shown how China treats dissidents. The Eslite case shows that China is trying to spread fear of war, anti-Democratic Progressive Party sentiment and skepticism about the US ahead of next year’s presidential election. Indeed, China’s meddling in democratic elections has already aroused concern in many other nations.
The US, Canada and Australia have uncovered cyberattacks and information warfare that have been attributed to China’s security and intelligence agencies.
The government should conduct a thorough investigation of the Eslite case, especially looking into possible collusion between China and Taiwanese companies.
he Executive Yuan last month approved amendments to three anti-scam laws, and the Legislature yesterday third-reading passed the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) to raise the fines for institutions that fail to safeguard personal data security. The cabinet also enacted a new plan to assist private firms counter fraud.
However, these laws will not stop all the attacks, so people should establish their own self-conscious “firewalls” to shut out China’s cognitive warfare.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS