According to newspaper reports, oral tests are to be gradually added to national examinations starting next year.
Additionally, for jobs that require high stress resistance and emotional stability or involve firearms, science-based psychological tests are to be used to help with talent selection.
Although the new direction is correct, there must also be adequate preparation.
The psychological requirements for different civil servant positions vary greatly. For example, the psychological qualities needed for a general administrative post are different from those for a National Security Bureau job. Despite some special examinations including oral tests, it seems difficult to pick the right people based on a brief exam.
Also, a particular psychological quality might be an advantage for one type of work, but a disadvantage for another.
The Examination Yuan must create a database of psychological traits required by different types of jobs and establish a baseline for each position and level. By comparing applicants’ psychological test results against such a baseline, the government would be able to understand whether they are suitable for the jobs they are applying for.
Next, the government should reform its training and promotion systems to encourage employees to enhance their mental fortitude. The psychological qualities required to serve as a junior, intermediate or senior-level civil servant are not the same.
However, the curriculum does not provide psychological training for next-level posts.
Psychological tests should also be integrated with the assessment of the related training and promotion systems.
Although an intermediate-level civil servant might have completed the training necessary for a promotion to senior level, if their mental state does not fully meet the baseline of a good senior employee, the training system should offer courses on improving their mental fortitude. That person should not be promoted until they pass all the courses.
The high-tech industry has long incorporated psychological tests in talent recruitment, to reduce training costs while boosting industrial efficiency.
Today, the functions required by modern civil servants are different from those required by officials who were selected through the imperial examination system of the past. Therefore, national examinations should be adjusted in a timely manner.
Liu Chao-lung is an associate professor in National Changhua University of Education’s Department of Public Affairs and Civic Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS