According to newspaper reports, oral tests are to be gradually added to national examinations starting next year.
Additionally, for jobs that require high stress resistance and emotional stability or involve firearms, science-based psychological tests are to be used to help with talent selection.
Although the new direction is correct, there must also be adequate preparation.
The psychological requirements for different civil servant positions vary greatly. For example, the psychological qualities needed for a general administrative post are different from those for a National Security Bureau job. Despite some special examinations including oral tests, it seems difficult to pick the right people based on a brief exam.
Also, a particular psychological quality might be an advantage for one type of work, but a disadvantage for another.
The Examination Yuan must create a database of psychological traits required by different types of jobs and establish a baseline for each position and level. By comparing applicants’ psychological test results against such a baseline, the government would be able to understand whether they are suitable for the jobs they are applying for.
Next, the government should reform its training and promotion systems to encourage employees to enhance their mental fortitude. The psychological qualities required to serve as a junior, intermediate or senior-level civil servant are not the same.
However, the curriculum does not provide psychological training for next-level posts.
Psychological tests should also be integrated with the assessment of the related training and promotion systems.
Although an intermediate-level civil servant might have completed the training necessary for a promotion to senior level, if their mental state does not fully meet the baseline of a good senior employee, the training system should offer courses on improving their mental fortitude. That person should not be promoted until they pass all the courses.
The high-tech industry has long incorporated psychological tests in talent recruitment, to reduce training costs while boosting industrial efficiency.
Today, the functions required by modern civil servants are different from those required by officials who were selected through the imperial examination system of the past. Therefore, national examinations should be adjusted in a timely manner.
Liu Chao-lung is an associate professor in National Changhua University of Education’s Department of Public Affairs and Civic Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS