Some opposition lawmakers have proposed tasking the central bank with creating a sovereign wealth fund financed by the nation’s foreign exchange reserves to boost investment returns. They have clearly conflated the monetary regulator’s job with that of a fund manager.
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) proposed allocating 10 percent of the nation’s foreign reserves — US$560.2 billion as of last month — to a sovereign wealth fund, following in the footsteps of Norway, Singapore, China and South Korea.
Taiwan has the world’s fourth-largest foreign exchange reserves, which last month rose for a record sixth consecutive month.
Wu said that in light of such massive reserves, the 2.6 percent annual return on the central bank’s management of foreign exchange reserves was too low, compared with the average 7 percent that Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, GIC Pte, has yielded since its inception in 1981.
A similar sovereign wealth fund run by the central bank could seek the highest financial returns by diversifying its investment targets, Wu said, adding that investing in foreign companies with strategic technologies could enhance Taiwan’s global clout.
She said the creation of such a fund is imperative, as about 80 percent of G20 countries have set up sovereign wealth funds, adding that 64 other lawmakers have endorsed her proposal.
However, Wu’s plan does not go beyond wishful thinking, as there is no guarantee that an investment will be profitable. Furthermore, higher returns require higher risks, while investing in companies with strategic technologies does not mean owning the technologies, nor playing a deciding role in steering the companies’ operations.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, the biggest of its kind, lost US$167 billion last year, with an annual return rate of minus-13.9 percent.
The central bank’s main tasks are to keep inflation within its target range, and maintain stability in the financial markets and the local currency, as Taiwan is prone to volatility in external markets. Turning a profit has never been the bank’s first priority.
More importantly, Taiwan must protect itself from potential financial meltdowns, as it is not a member of the IMF and external aid might not always be on hand.
Large foreign exchange reserves are a protection tool and can provide emergency capital for local lenders during tough times. Taiwan’s deep foreign exchange reserves helped it weather global financial crises in 1997 and 2008.
A large portion of Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves is constituted by local stocks and bonds held by foreign investors, with a market value of US$538.9 billion. Any significant outflows could cause a drastic reduction in foreign exchange reserves.
A sovereign wealth fund invests in real and financial assets. Taiwan already has four such wealth funds, including the Labor Pension Fund. Before the government can consider setting up a new sovereign wealth fund, there are several questions that need to be answered: What is the purpose of setting up a new fund? How will the fund be financed? Is it appropriate to finance the fund from the nation’s foreign exchange reserves? Does the fund need to be operated by the central bank?
The lawmakers who proposed setting up such a fund should have thought twice about their plan.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS