On Monday last week, a three-year-old girl died and her mother was injured after a vehicle making a left turn collided with them as they crossed an intersection in Tainan.
The incident has caused an uproar, as it is not the only pedestrian traffic incident involving women and children recently.
Since a CNN article referred to Taiwan as a “living hell” for pedestrians, the public has demanded that the government address the issue.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications responded by suggesting that all local governments should implement scramble crossings at all intersections.
The pros and cons of this measure have been debated across the country. A scramble crossing allows people to cross in any direction with all traffic signals for vehicles red, creating pedestrian-only crossing times, which would prevent collisions.
Many countries have implemented the measure. In Taiwan, such traffic signals operate on roads close to the Taipei City Government. From my experience, they are effective and worth promoting. With scramble crossings, pedestrians can cross the road diagonally, and their safety would be protected.
However, for drivers, scramble crossings require more time waiting for a green light, which could cause discontent. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications and local governments must plan safety measures with care, especially on narrower roads and in areas with more traffic.
Not every intersection is suitable for a scramble crossing. Officials should first evaluate which locations are suitable, then consider the times pedestrian-only crossings should be designated. The length of the crossing time should also be deliberated.
Further arrangements and supporting measures should be planned. With scramble crossings, traffic congestion is likely to be more frequent, and worsen during rush hour.
To avoid these problems, the government should modify rules about the lanes for turning vehicles. Otherwise, queues in those lanes would make congestion worse, and the public would find fault with local officials and enforcement units.
The fundamental problem is that most drivers in Taiwan fail to show respect to pedestrians. It is not an exaggeration to say that drivers and scooter riders have made the country a “living hell” for pedestrians.
Agencies and authorities must publicize traffic rules and regulations, and make it clear that anyone who breaks the law would be punished harshly. Hopefully this would prevent traffic collisions and make pedestrians safer.
The situation has recently improved. When I cross an intersection, I can see that drivers and scooter riders are more patient.
They stop their vehicles and allow me to walk across first. In return, I give them a thumbs up to show my gratitude. I want drivers to know that their patience allows me to cross the road in peace.
Other than implementing scramble crossings nationwide, the government should keep educating the public on the importance of respecting pedestrians, and it should enforce harsher punishments for those who break the law. Hopefully, Taiwan will no longer be a living hell for pedestrians.
Tsai Jr-keng is a retired elementary-school teacher living in Taipei.
Translated by Emma Liu
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS