Fashion and its changing shapes have long stirred controversy. Once it was women in pants who drew a frenzied backlash. Today it is the choices of people who identify as nonbinary, and challenge the norm in what they choose to wear and how they want to shop.
Amid the furor, a few — too few — mainstream brands have had the foresight to design clothes for people who do not sit neatly in the gender binary, and for an expanding group of young shoppers who prefer to dress across gender lines. The communities these companies see have always existed, even when they were not acknowledged, and now their choices are helping reinvent how people think about everyday dressing.
Sped up by social media and the influence of international celebrities such as Harry Styles, nonbinary fashion is becoming more prevalent and driving retailers to figure out how to catch up.
Illustration: Mountain People
Women first started wearing pants regularly in the early 20th century to widespread condemnation. Those who wore bloomers (a precursor to pants) and trousers came to represent a larger cultural shift called “bloomerism,” which described women engaging in more masculine pastimes such as drinking, smoking and gambling.
The threat became so overwhelming that cities passed laws banning women from wearing pants. The fear was that if women wore pants, what would be next? Men wearing dresses while they are bossed around by their wives? What even is a man if women can wear pants?
Sound familiar? History suggests retailers that cave to backward-looking ideals risk falling behind those that see nonbinary shoppers are a deeply rooted part of the consumer landscape. The community at 1.2 million might appear niche, but brands with gender neutral clothing are marketing to the entire LGBTQ population.
Building a reputation for inclusivity also appeals to a broader segment of young shoppers, who seek out such brands and are also more likely to shop outside their gender identity. While much of mainstream retail has ignored these shifts, companies such as Target, Nordstrom, Uniqlo and Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) are slowly changing that, providing a model for the way forward.
That path runs through the culture wars. Republicans have this year pushed through dozens of state bills that do everything from rolling back gender-affirming healthcare to banning transgender girls in sports. Similar to a century ago, how people dress is also under attack. Several states have introduced — and Tennessee has passed — laws criminalizing drag performances. The Texas Department of Agriculture last month started requiring staff to dress “in a manner consistent with their biological gender.”
Cultural change often precedes political change, and that can already be seen in how retail racks are starting to shift as people embrace their individual gender identities.
For many nonbinary people, clothes are more than a necessity or self-expression — they are a kind of armor. For most people outfits to mark the first day of work or a first date are often carefully selected to exude confidence. For a community whose humanity is under threat, clothing offers protection and affirmation.
What better feeling than when a pair of jeans hangs from your hips in just the right way or a loose crop top flutters at your waist? For nonbinary people, that feeling is part of their survival kit, MI Leggett, founder of the genderless and sustainable fashion brand Official Rebrand, told me.
Leggett’s Official Rebrand, which incorporated in 2017, redesigns excess and defective stock from brands into new pieces that do not fall into the gender binary. Some clothes have explicit messages such as “God is trans,” while others are designed without a particular feminine or masculine silhouette to show gender’s expansiveness, said Leggett, who uses they and he pronouns.
They said that wearing clothes that affirm their gender, makes them feel like “a much better version of myself.”
Yet shopping as someone who does not squarely fit into the gender binary can be stressful. At best, shoppers zigzag across departments from men’s clothing to women’s and even children’s, looking for something that fits their bodies and tastes. Once they are ready with a stack of options, they typically have to choose between men’s and women’s fitting rooms, and risk catching confused looks or someone telling them they are in the wrong dressing room. Often they leave exhausted, disheveled and without a purchase.
Shopping online does not provide much relief when it comes to fit and style either. This is despite that luxury designers have experimented with unisex fashion for decades. In the late 1960s, Parisian designers such as Pierre Cardin and Andre Courreges, inspired by the Space Age, designed clothing pieces with simple silhouettes.
As recently as 2020, Marc Jacobs introduced a polysexual collection of clothing for “girls who are boys and boys who are girls [and] those who are neither.” From Stella McCartney to Gucci, high-end companies have rolled out lines that lie outside of the gender binary.
The irony of luxury companies conceptualizing gender neutral clothing is that LGBTQ people face higher rates of poverty, unemployment and homelessness. They often have trouble finding work, and many find stable income in service jobs at restaurants, cleaning companies or gig work.
So when companies such as Target or H&M release gender neutral lines, it helps make shopping much more affordable. Target’s Pride Collection comes out once a year, but features gender inclusive pieces that can be worn any time, including binders, an undergarment people use over their chest for a flatter look. H&M’s Unisex store features T-shirts and hoodies that are not designed for a particular gender. It is the same for its Denim United line. PacSun’s 2021 The Colour Range was a collection “curated without a specific gender in mind.”
Still, some of these lines have drawn critiques from LGBTQ people. Target revamped its Pride collection with several LGBTQ designers after its 2021 edition was called out of touch, performative and confusing.
Few of these moves have come without homophobic and transphobic backlash. When Target introduced a gender neutral kids clothing line, people vowed to boycott the company. Some shoppers at H&M have railed against its move to unisex fitting rooms. The risk of rolling out such lines is losing some customers or facing a public relations nightmare — something the maker of Bud Light experienced after a collaboration with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
However, Nora Kleinewillinghoefer, an associate partner in the consumer practice of consulting firm Kearney, said that successful brands are blending gender neutral clothing into their stores so that they are available for anyone, and building it into their larger strategy. Organizing stores around product categories (rather than gender) can help normalize gender neutrality.
Nonbinary people have always found a way to shop, whether it is weaving together a look using clothes from men’s and women’s departments or frequenting thrift stores where the gender binary is less enforced. Sports retailers such as Nike have become mainstays in many closets in part because they do not cater to one gender over another. You would be hard pressed to find a nonbinary person without a Nike sports bra in their drawer.
The question is which are the next big brands that will be sitting alongside it.
Leticia Miranda is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering consumer goods and the retail industry. She was previously a business reporter at NBC News and a retail reporter at BuzzFeed News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state. Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade
RSS