Under the leadership of South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, South Korea has pursued closer ties with the US and Japan in national defense, security and diplomacy, bolstering its commitment to the trilateral partnership.
Following consecutive visits to the US, Yoon took a step toward mending frayed ties with Japan, a relationship that deteriorated under the administration of former South Korean president Moon Jae-in.
In the US, Yoon and US President Joe Biden reiterated that they would stand together to tackle North Korea’s advancing nuclear program and its threat to regional security. Under the Washington Declaration, South Korea has also dropped the idea of building its own nuclear arsenal in return for protection under the US’ nuclear umbrella.
On Sunday, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida visited Seoul. As the host, Yoon said that “we should stay away from a thinking that we must not make a step forward because our history issues aren’t settled completely.”
To heal the countries’ historical feud, Yoon also announced a plan to compensate South Koreans who were subjected to forced labor during Japan’s colonial rule. His arrangement would not require Japanese companies to contribute to the reparations.
Yoon also expressed his willingness to set aside their differences and focus on collaborating on regional security and economic issues, and said that Seoul would not rule out Japan’s participation in the Washington Declaration.
Some critics say that Yoon’s moves were not only intended to help deal with the North Korean threat, but more importantly to create a strategy that improves relations in the region. If China attacks Taiwan, North Korea could seek to create a diversion to prevent US forces stationed in South Korea from assisting Taiwan, by striking its neighbor, perhaps with an all-out invasion.
As the situation would be much more complicated if war breaks out, Yoon must take precautions by solidifying the trilateral partnership with the US and Japan, not only to ensure peace in the Taiwan Strait, but also security in the Korean Peninsula.
Yoon’s actions show that he possesses vision and foresight, and he has proven himself to be an outstanding leader when he managed to make a breakthrough amid pressure from anti-US and anti-Japanese sentiment in South Korea.
While a South Korean leader has shown the resolve to say that “the Taiwan issue is a global issue,” it is dismaying to hear what potential presidential candidates in Taiwan have said about their diplomatic positions, especially regarding national defense and regional security.
The series of unnerving remarks include Hon Hai Precision Industry founder Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) pro-China comments that cater to “deep blue” supporters with statements such as the best antidote to Chinese jet incursions is to sing the national anthem and wave the national flag, or that Taiwan should stop buying arms from the US. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) gave a reluctant and prevaricating response that acknowledges China as the biggest threat to Taiwan during a question-and-answer session, while Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has promoted forming equal ties with the US and China with the idea of looking toward Washington for economic aid and Beijing for national defense.
The remarks show that these potential candidates either have an appeasing or self-defeating attitude toward national defense, or else they consider themselves smart enough to have come up with a solution that transcends all predicaments.
However, it is doubtful that they have the vision to lead Taiwan on a path to prosperity and peace.
Roger Wu works in the service industry in New Taipei City.
Translated by Rita Wang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS