In his denial to the Legislative Yuan to legalize euthanasia (“Government cannot take lead in law on euthanasia: Hsueh,” April 27, page 2), I suggest Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) should come clean and admit that his ministry, through selective neglect of national health insurance, is responsible for countless assisted deaths. Denying insurance coverage for serious cancer patients is the same as pulling feeding tubes for assisted suicide.
I am referring to advanced-care cancer patients who are deprived of critically needed medicines due to the National Health Insurance policy to cut funding to counter high costs, with the excuse that the NHI “can’t cover everybody.”
By failing to cover the seriously ill, is this not de facto assisted suicide? Whatever happened to the ministry’s slogan of Health for All?
As a cancer patient and a Taiwanese citizen with lymphoma, I am currently deprived of all insurance funding for my essential medication (Opdivo), for which there is no known substitute. That means that every fortnight, I have to pay out of pocket more than NT$48,000 for an injection, and that comes to nearly NT$100,000 each month.
Last year, it was shocking to learn from my oncologist at Taipei Medical University that tens of thousands of people are like me. Many are bankrupt or facing it, or just scrapping by covering costs. Many who cannot get their medicine without assistance give up and wait, likely with NHI “life-extending care,” for certain death by cancer without their vital medication.
Hsueh, as a lawyer, likely knows that late-term cancer patients make easy targets. They are elderly, distracted by illness and depression, lack resources, are often shut in and lack contact — and are well conditioned not to question bureaucratic decisions that will end their lives. Is this not the moment for all medical staff and officials to rally to the Hippocratic Oath, stand up and do their utmost for vulnerable patients? Was this not the vision of health insurance?
Last year, in the first term of my cancer, my doctor told me that I was “lucky,” as there are only limited cancer patients covered through a type of “lottery system.” Apparently, that lottery selects who gets covered while the others get bumped. This year, my coverage term ran out and that cancer lottery went against me, and I have joined the many Taiwanese in an isolated journey without end.
Curtis Smith is founder of the Union of TAITRA Workers.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS