US President Joe Biden on Monday last week met with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr at the White House as part of his administration’s efforts to bolster the US’ security and economic relations with countries in the Indo-Pacific region.
The Philippines has garnered attention because of its strategic importance amid escalating tensions between China and its neighboring countries. With its proximity to Taiwan and critical location connecting the South China Sea and the Pacific, the Philippines is a crucial ally and, during a conflict, would be a resupply point and could control chokepoints.
The lasting alliance between the Philippines and the US has been cemented by the Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951, which obligates each nation to aid the other in the event of an attack by a third party.
In light of China’s military activities around Taiwan, which have unnerved senior Philippine officials, Manila has granted the US military new access to four Philippine military bases. Three of the bases are on the main island of Luzon, close to Taiwan, while the fourth is in Palawan province, which lies in the South China Sea. The move underscores the strategic importance of the Philippines in the region’s security landscape.
China has long recognized the Philippines’ strategic value owing to its favorable geographic location. The country’s proximity to the Luzon Strait and the Bashi Channel has been identified as particularly critical, as these passages provide access to the Pacific and the South China Sea. China’s bid to assert control over Fuga Island serves as testament to this fact.
In 2019, the Chinese Fong Zhi Enterprise Corp tried to establish a “smart city” on the island.
However, due to Fuga Island’s location, which is not only less than 400km from Taiwan, but also of significant importance to the Philippines’ own defense, Philippine officials were alarmed. Their concern was that it would allow China to establish an observation post within Philippine borders. Consequently, a Philippine naval base was established on the island.
Some Philippine military officials have said their country would be an ideal corridor for the US to supply Taiwan with munitions in the event of a conflict.
“We are a US ally, we are in a strategic location. We are so close that if anything happens in Taiwan, we will be involved,” said General Emmanuel Bautista, former chief of staff of the armed forces of the Philippines, in an interview with the Financial Times.
Marcos has also signaled in an interview with the Nikkei the need to cooperate with Washington in a possible strategic exigency in the Taiwan Strait, saying that instability in the region would adversely affect the Philippines.
The Philippines holds a critical role in any potential conflict between Taiwan and China, as it is in proximity to southern shipping lanes in the South China Sea and the Luzon Strait facing China.
This geographical positioning makes the Philippines a key focus for all involved parties, whether there is a full Chinese invasion of Taiwan or just a naval blockade.
The significance of the Philippines’ military projection in a Taiwan Strait war cannot be overstated, as it offers the US military a range of bases closer to the assumed theater of war.
Despite a lack of official discussions at this stage, Taiwan, as a key stakeholder in a potential conflict, must recognize the strategic importance of the Philippines.
Lien Yi-ting is a graduate student at the Harvard Kennedy School. She was a spokesperson for President Tsai Ing-wen’s re-election campaign and has worked at the Presidential Office and the National Security Council.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS