Publicly listed companies recently unveiled their first-quarter earnings reports, which showed that many firms’ financial results in the first three months of the year were worse than the previous quarter’s. Most companies attributed their poor performance to weakening global demand as central banks worldwide continued to raise interest rates to quell inflation expectations.
The central banks’ monetary tightening, led by the US Federal Reserve, came as global inflation seemed to be driven by an unusual mix of supply shocks associated first with the COVID-19 pandemic and later Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. With inflation surging to multi-decade highs, and price pressures broadening to housing, fuel, consumer goods and other services, central banks recognized the need to move more aggressively to avoid a worsening of inflation expectations, which would have damaged their credibility.
Unfortunately, the results of larger-than-expected interest rate hikes over the past 18 months were that the global economy slowed and demand cooled, while inflation became entrenched. Recent data showed that there is a high probability of inflation remaining stubbornly high in the next few years in the developed economies, as well as in developing and emerging economies.
That looks bad for Taiwan’s economy, which depends on external demand. Government data on April 28 showed that the nation’s GDP contracted for the second straight quarter, by a sharper-than-expected 3.02 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, following an annual contraction of 0.86 percent in the previous quarter. The decline last quarter was the largest since the second quarter of 2009.
On a quarter-on-quarter seasonally adjusted basis, GDP contracted by 1.63 percent in the first quarter, following a 0.37 percent decline in the final quarter of last year, meaning that the economy slipped into a technical recession due to two consecutive quarters of negative growth.
Taiwan’s economy experienced high growth from 2019 to 2021 before slipping to 2.43 percent growth last year. This year could prove to be a hard test for the nation, although economic momentum is likely to pick up a bit in the next three quarters on the back of improving private consumption. GDP growth might not stay above 2 percent this year, but one thing is certain — the electronics sector holds the key to Taiwan’s economic outlook.
In the past three years, rising orders in the domestic semiconductor industry provided firm support to the nation’s economy amid a tech boom. This year, the industry is experiencing weak order intake as tech demand slows and customers further adjust inventories. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, for instance, last month projected that revenue for this year could decline slightly, while other local wafer foundries and IC designers were downbeat about this year’s business as weakening macroeconomic conditions affect demand.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics expects the economy to grow 1.67 percent this year, and estimates that the post-pandemic special budget — including the NT$6,000 cash handout for Taiwanese and some foreign residents — is expected to boost GDP growth by about 0.35 to 0.45 percentage points. The economy still has a chance to expand by 2 percent this year.
However, many uncertainties remain globally, including geopolitical risks and the monetary policies of central banks, both of which could affect Taiwan’s external demand and put in doubt the nation’s export outlook. Therefore, aside from the one-off NT$6,000 cash payments, the government should devise measures to boost domestic demand and investment to cushion the weakness in exports. Meanwhile, the public should realize that it is normal to see a correction after years of expansion in economic growth.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its