Protesters on Monday demanded better wage protections, and improved labor rights for temporary workers and those in the gig economy. Wage issues have been on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration’s agenda since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office in 2016, and although minimum and hourly wages have increased since then, advocates say real wages have been heavily affected by inflation and rising housing costs.
An opinion piece published in Forbes on May 19, 2018, said that wages in South Korea and Japan were significantly higher than those in Taiwan, despite similar levels of economic development. Three years later, on Sept. 29, 2021, an opinion piece on news Web site The News Lens made the same argument.
“In South Korea, minimum wage has kept pace with exports and even surged ahead of corporate profits and housing prices, but it has been the other way round in Taiwan,” Roy Ngerng wrote.
He said that wages in Taiwan had been higher than profits until 2002, when wage increases slowed, despite rising profits. He contrasted Taiwan’s situation with that of EU countries, where he said workers shared a fairer percentage of profits.
“If Taiwan’s minimum wage had kept pace over the last two to three decades, or grown at the pace of profits, it could have been twice as high as it is today,” he wrote.
Many companies point to annual bonuses as making up the wage difference, but bonuses are not guaranteed income, and they vary tremendously across industries and between employers.
Regardless, further minimum wage hikes might not be the solution, as information engineer Dino Wei (魏世昌) wrote in an article published on Sept. 10 last year.
“Raising the minimum wage only affects the salaries of workers on minimum wage in the first place, not those on higher wages,” Wei wrote. “The Tsai government needs to figure out how to solve the problems of high commodity prices, high inflation and the rising cost of housing.”
In its report on Monday’s protest, the Central News Agency cited local trade union leader Hsu Chien-tung (許建東) as saying that wages falling behind the rising cost of living is a “national security issue,” one that has led to a declining birthrate and shrinking labor force. This is a plausible assessment given that couples who are struggling financially are much less likely to have children, especially if they have no access to affordable and suitable housing.
Low wages are also a national security issue as China is taking advantage of discontent to sow social unrest, which opposition parties would undoubtedly amplify in an effort to remove the DPP from power. Beijing has already shown its willingness to exploit the issue when it introduced its so-called “31 incentives,” promising jobs and other benefits to young Taiwanese who relocate to China. Such efforts are an attempt to cripple Taiwan’s industries and military.
The government cannot force private industry to raise real wages, but it can offer tax incentives or other benefits to companies that pay workers livable wages. It should also seek ways to offset inflation, tackle runaway housing prices and reduce interest rates for first-time homeowners. One-time vouchers and increases to wages for the lowest-paid workers will not solve Taiwan’s labor woes. The government needs an aggressive and comprehensive approach to the problem.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS