Since 2021, the South Korean TV series Squid Game, created for Netflix, has become a global phenomenon. Many Taiwanese have been wondering if Taiwan’s TV and film industry could bring about a similar success.
Over the past year, the Taiwanese horror film Incantation (咒) and detective fiction series Copycat Killer (模仿犯) catapulted to the top of the streaming giant’s charts. Apparently, as long as a work is well produced and oriented toward the market, Taiwan can certainly set foot in the international film and entertainment industry.
Some might say that Incantation and Copycat are exceptions to the rule. If that were the case, could Taiwan continue to export its cultural productions to the world? What should be done to improve Taiwan’s TV and film industry?
Due to the development of international streaming platforms, the world has become more globalized, and as a result, people can watch many TV series and films produced in foreign countries. It also means that Taiwan’s productions have to compete with those produced abroad. The competition is not limited to how well a story is told, how creative the ideas are and how capable a production team is. Instead, it has everything to do with capital.
Take Squid Game for example. Although the budget for the entire first season was enough to produce only one episode of Stranger Things, it was still several times higher than the budget of a quality TV series in Taiwan. In this sense, a key hindrance to the growth of local content is capital.
Throughout the history of Taiwan’s TV and film industry, the government has provided a substantial amount of subsidiary grants. They were initially meant to ensure the competitiveness of films produced in the nation. In the past few years, to stimulate the industry, the government has continued to offer grants, and increased the amount of investment in film and TV productions. The official strategy has indeed achieved some fruitful outcomes.
Taiwan’s productions have become more diversified in subject matters, and the quality of the productions has significantly improved.
However, for Taiwan’s TV and film industry to grow vigorously, it needs more investment from the private sector. The industry is overly dependent on government funding. According to Digitimes, more than 70 percent of funding for the TV and film industry came from government and Ministry of Culture subsidies.
This can lead to two problems in the long run:
First, compared with international productions, Taiwan’s film and TV content lacks marketability. Given that these productions are mostly funded by the government, they are not necessarily oriented toward the market.
Second, when production teams vie for government grants, they become more likely to consider officials’ aesthetic tastes and values over market trends. The content is determined by officials rather than by the market.
If these problems could be solved, Taiwan’s cultural content can and will become more prominent in the international market. To achieve this goal, the industry must reduce its reliance on the government and design a system of incentive mechanisms to raise funds from non-governmental organizations. This is crucial to boosting the marketability of Taiwan’s TV and film productions.
Therefore, the “tax credits” policy as proposed in an amendment to the Development of the Cultural and Creative Industries Act (文化創意產業發展法) should be applauded. According to Article 27, companies or a person may deduct or be exempt from the payable tax if they invest in the research and development of cultural creativity and talent cultivation.
Hopefully, this will bring more private capital into Taiwan’s cultural content and improve the quality of its TV and film industry.
For the tax credits policy to be effectively implemented, production teams must embrace the market with ambition, displaying creative ideas and content catering to the general public.
At the same time, non-governmental organizations willing to subsidize the industry should understand the cultural content, while grasping how the international market works.
With the nation’s private sector becoming involved and offering financial assistance, Taiwan’s cultural content industry would prosper.
Byron Fong is an associate professor in National Taiwan University’s Department of Economics.
Translated by Emma Liu
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the