Renowned Taiwanese sculptor Ju Ming (朱銘) last month died of apparent suicide at the age of 85 after a prolonged illness. It came after former sports commentator Fu Da-jen (傅達仁) traveled to Switzerland in 2018 to end his life through physician-assisted suicide. Even celebrities with great access to resources are denied the right to a dignified death in Taiwan, so the public must face an even harder situation.
Those who oppose the legalization of assisted suicide emphasize two points: First, they worry that some families could pressure sick relatives to be euthanized to avoid caring for them, or that some people would choose to die so as not to burden their families. Second, it goes against some people’s religious beliefs.
However, both are hard to justify in law.
Euthanasia laws in many countries require professionals such as doctors to act as a “neutral third party” to assess a case, so it does not entirely depend on the will of the person seeking assistance or their family.
Ju’s and Fu’s cases show that the lack of regulations over assisted suicide can result in people taking their lives anyway, which is not a solution.
It is not a choice between pro-euthanasia and anti-euthanasia, as in reality it is the difference between regulated euthanasia and suicide.
As for religious beliefs, the separation of church and state is a fundamental principle of the Constitution. Religion cannot be used to deny people the right to make decisions about their lives.
If the government wants to restrict people’s power to make decisions about their own lives, it should bear the “burden of proof,” and should be reviewed based on constitutional standards.
Chen Chih-hsiung is dean of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Law.
Translated by Eddy Chang
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic