On the last Wednesday in April each year, the world celebrates International Guide Dog Day. Many events are held to show appreciation to guide dogs. This is also an opportunity to educate the public about them.
If one encounters a guide dog on duty, it is necessary to obey the following principle: You should not call, feed or pat the dog. Sudden sounds or actions might distract it from the task of guiding its visually impaired handler. Also, a guide dog should always be welcome in any public place, and the handler should be asked if they need further assistance.
There are about 60,000 visually impaired people in Taiwan. According to the International Guide Dog Federation, the ideal ratio of guide dogs to visually impaired people is 1 to 100. Ideally, there should be at least 600 guide dogs in Taiwan.
It is regrettable that there are merely about 40 guide dogs approved by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. This number is far lower than international standards. Taiwanese society certainly needs more guide dogs.
However, it is extremely difficult to train a dog to be a guide. Only about 10 guide dogs are trained and matched with handlers per year in Taiwan. Several reasons have contributed to this, including a lack of funding for professionals and institutions that train them, and the difficulty of finding a foster family for dogs undergoing training.
Taiwan must put more effort into training guide dogs. This requires investment from professional training institutions. The government and the public should strongly support and pay attention to the issue. In so doing, visually impaired people can live in a society that is safer and more convenient.
Most importantly, the government should provide more subsidies for guide dogs, not only to make their living spaces better and more comfortable, but also to create a safer and more professional training environment. Second, policies and laws regarding guide dogs and visually impaired people should be updated to ensure a barrier-free environment. In this way, visually impaired people and their guide dogs can gain more access to public spaces and feel safer and unworried.
Third, it is necessary to disseminate accurate information about guide dogs, and such information should be integrated into school curricula. By so doing, the public would understand how significant guide dogs are to society. Fourth, more subsidies should be provided for foster families so that more guide dogs could be raised and trained. Fifth, the authorities must take action against people who contravene the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法). For example, if a restaurant refuses to let a visually impaired handler enter with their guide dog, the restaurant owner should be penalized.
Society must gain a deeper understanding of guide dogs, and more people should show their support by joining volunteer programs or donating supplies. Moreover, when a guide dog is about to retire, the agencies involved should arrange for the dog to be adopted by a suitable family.
Taiwanese should work on the issue together. Guide dogs should be supported, appreciated and cherished. It is for the benefit of the visually impaired, as well as to create a truly friendly society.
Su Wei-cheng is a lecturer and a former secretary of the president of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Emma Liu
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS