Some local governments are lobbying for subsidies for oocyte cryopreservation — extracting and freezing eggs from women, with legislators asking the Ministry of Health and Welfare to consider the proposal. Egg freezing seems to have become a silver bullet to solve the problem of delayed marriage and childbearing, but is it?
What would the benefits be of subsidizing the process? What would be the purpose of government subsidies in the national budget? Would it increase the birthrate?
Research in many nations has shown that the main reason women have their eggs frozen is not career or study considerations, but the lack of a partner. What about women in Taiwan? What do they say they need the process for? There is a lack of information to refer to, so implementing subsidies to raise the birthrate without relevant data might be a lot of expense in vain — like hunting for teacups at a hardware store.
International studies show that less than 20 percent of people actually use eggs they have had frozen to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF), while the success rate of IVF is 30 to 40 percent.
Long-term tracking data in research published last year by National Taiwan University Hospital’s Obstetrics and Gynecology Department showed that over the 18 years of the study, fewer than 10 percent of 645 women who had their eggs frozen had them thawed, with 17 of those who did giving birth. That is a success rate of only 2.6 percent.
Is it reasonable or necessary to use government funds to subsidize egg freezing when the usage and the live birth rates are so low? Why not use these funds to improve support for parents or other things?
Another issue is that the regulatory mechanism for egg freezing is lacking. The focus is on the state of the eggs when they are thawed and used, and avoiding situations in which eggs become unusable after being stored for many years.
Moreover, there were cases of equipment malfunctions at reproduction institutions in the US resulting in the loss of eggs and even embryos. There needs to be careful study of the management of egg freezing institutions in Taiwan so that the rights of prospective parents are protected.
There is no specific law regulating egg freezing in Taiwan, with the preservation of reproductive cells falling under the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法), which only applies to women who donate eggs. It does not cover the preservation of eggs for use by the prospective mother.
Moreover, there are no regulations or a supervisory system for institutions that provide egg freezing services. Should there be cases of frozen eggs not being properly preserved, it would become a dispute between the consumer and the institution.
Before it even thinks about subsidizing egg freezing, the government should first improve the supervisory system, including monitoring and management of equipment, tracking data such as the freeze and thaw success rates, health assessments and regulating advertising.
Subsidies should only be implemented after these issues are tackled, otherwise it would be like throwing money in the trash.
The attention on egg freezing might be masking a problem with society. Women are freezing their eggs to preserve their fertility as delayed marriage and childbirth become more common. If the government wants to promote subsidies, it needs to do more assessment and planning instead of throwing money at the issue. It must deal with it substantially.
However, the social impact could be complicated if it acts prudently. The underlying problems of delayed marriage and childbearing should be the focus, not the stop-gap measure of subsidies.
Chen Su-fang is secretary-general of the Taiwan Women’s Link.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS