The government is planning to double subsidies paid to care facility residents with disability level 4 or above to NT$120,000 per year and remove an exclusion clause for wealthy individuals, Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) said on Wednesday. Hsieh announced the plan after the Ministry of Health and Welfare in January said it would expand the Long-term Care Plan 2.0 to include a subsidy for families to enable them to send a family member in need of care to a short-term facility or employ a short-term care assistant for up to 52 days.
The two policies are examples of how the ministry is trying to better meet the needs of families in need of care services. They come as care demand is expected to increase rapidly. The ministry forecasts that the number of people in need of long-term care would climb to 1 million in 2026 from 820,000 last year. The Long-term Care Plan 2.0 was launched in 2017 to create an affordable and accessible long-term care system, and ensure that elderly and disabled people receive better care. It includes subsidies for in-home or facility care services, shuttle bus services, assistive devices, transforming people’s homes into a barrier-free environment and respite care services.
However, Taiwan’s 100,000 care facility residents and 200,000 people being cared for by migrant caregivers were previously excluded. Social welfare groups and lawmakers have championed calls for better services for disabled people and their families, highlighting discrepancies between services covered by the long-term care plan and their actual needs. The main problem is that the health ministry’s plan does not integrate services offered by migrant caregivers under the purview of the Ministry of Labor.
Many affected families have said it is too difficult to find a suitable migrant in-home caregiver — an issue that is exacerbated by regulations that impose waiting periods before families can replace a worker who left their job without prior notice. Many families also distrust residential facilities, thinking that taking care of an elderly family member at home is a matter of filial piety. Despite cultural and language barriers and often insufficient training, hiring a migrant caregiver remains the option of choice for many families, as migrants offer one-on-one services around the clock for a minimum salary of NT$20,000 per month. Hiring a care service that employs Taiwanese professionals costs two to three times that amount, while service is limited to fewer hours. Migrant caregivers often find their duties overwhelming, and there is too little rest and emotional support available to them. The prospect of a job in a factory, for which their average salary is NT$30,000 per month, is tempting for many migrants, while others see their in-home care job in Taiwan as a stepping stone to better employment in a third country.
Meanwhile, many families say respite care services might not be suitable, as it would take a temporary caregiver too much time to learn how to address all the needs of the person they should care for, while other families are not aware that they are eligible for those services. Government data showed that only 5 percent of eligible families booked respite care services last year. While the overall number of migrant workers has returned to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels, the number of social welfare workers, including in-home caregivers, has continued to decrease.
On Wednesday, Hsueh said: “Taiwanese prefer one-on-one 24/7 long-term care services, but if we continue to go in this direction, we will never have enough care workers.” Meanwhile, a Control Yuan report on the long-term care plan said that while the number of care facilities is rising, quality remains uneven, as there is no sufficient monitoring mechanism. The health ministry should address this issue, while continuing to expand the plan. It should also enhance cross-ministerial efforts to integrate services offered by migrant workers into Taiwan’s long-term care architecture.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s