The government’s Bilingual 2030 policy, which aims to improve nationwide English-language proficiency, has proved unpopular with teachers, a teachers’ union representative has said.
Teachers said that focusing on English-language performance would negatively affect learning in other subjects, while not guaranteeing fluency in English, National Federation of Teachers Unions chairman Hou Chun-liang (侯俊良) said.
Meanwhile, National Taiwan University professor Sebastian Liao (廖咸浩) has said that artificial intelligence (AI) tools might replace foreign-language learning within a decade.
Even if Taiwanese were to become more proficient in English, this would not necessarily result in greater international competitiveness, Liao said. Many Filipinos, from a country where English is widely spoken, still have to go abroad to find work, while Japan, where English is not commonly used, boasts a strong economy, technological prowess and cultural influence, Liao added.
As one of the four Asian Tigers that underwent rapid industrialization and economic growth from the 1960s to the 1990s, Taiwan today dominates the global semiconductor industry. Senior US officials have said that an attack on Taiwan by China would devastate the global economy, given the world’s reliance on Taiwanese chips.
One would be hard pressed to argue that company-wide fluency in English would make companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co even more competitive. Insistence on company-wide use of English for internal communications could be conversely detrimental to a tech company, as it could result in miscommunication or hamper discussions of technical topics. Foreign-language ability would only be a soft skill for engineers, scientists or people in other highly technical professions. English or foreign-
language skills might only be needed in such professions during international meetings on trade or cooperation, and even then, it would be more apt for the company to hire an interpreter, rather than require all staff to speak a foreign language.
Most schools and major companies in Taiwan test new hires on their English-language ability, or at least pay employees more if they demonstrate English proficiency. The result is a lot of time and money spent on cram schools, grade-school and university language classes, test preparation and other things, when that time and money could instead be spent on developing skills that would be more meaningful to an individual’s career interests.
If the government is truly motivated to promote widespread fluency in a foreign language, it would need a radically different approach than just adding more grade-school language classes. For example, the English-language ability of a Taiwanese student who attends one of the country’s international schools is nearly on a par with that of a native speaker. The reason for that is the language environment of such schools, in which all courses are generally taught in a foreign language. Teachers and students also generally interact in that language outside of the classroom.
Developing nationwide fluency in English would be a monumental task if the government were to do it properly. It would have to invest tens of billions of NT dollars to create a more natural environment for learning English. Whether English should be made a medium of instruction at all public schools should be carefully reassessed. For sure, there would be widespread opposition to such a policy. For precedent, Taiwan need only look at its own past as a colony of Japan, when Japanese was imposed as the language of all public and official communications, and school curricula.
Aside from promoting English-language learning, the government should seriously consider putting more effort into preparing Taiwanese students for future global trends like AI development. Language can be a tool, but what is more important is equipping young people with the right tool to aid their career, as well as national development.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the